At 2:40 AM -0600 1/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Automated smoke report for 5.8.7 patch 26746 >BRIANA: Digital Personal WorkStation (Alpha/1 cpu) > on openvms - V8.2 > using CC/DECC version 70190015 > smoketime 9 hours 48 minutes (average 4 hours 54 minutes) > >Summary: FAIL(F)
>[perlio] > [-.ext.Devel.Peek.t]Peek.t..............FAILED 21 Hmm. My brain is not parsing the difference between got and expected: got: [ SV = PVMG(0x34ee30) at 0x367210 REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = (GMG,SMG,RMG,pIOK,pPOK) IV = 0 NV = 0 PV = 0x43c0f8 "0"\0 CUR = 1 LEN = 4 MAGIC = 0x439d90 MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_envelem MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_envelem(e) MG_FLAGS = 0x01 TAINTEDDIR MG_LEN = -2 MG_PTR = 0x3eaad8 => HEf_SVKEY SV = PV(0x336100) at 0x3eaad8 REFCNT = 2 FLAGS = (TEMP,POK,pPOK) PV = 0x43f610 "PATH"\0 CUR = 4 LEN = 8 MAGIC = 0x43ef58 MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_taint MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_taint(t) ] expected: [ (?:ALLOCATED at .*? )?SV = PVMG\(0x[[:xdigit:]]+\) at 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ REFCNT = 1 FLAGS = \(GMG,SMG,RMG,pIOK,pPOK\) IV = 0 NV = 0 PV = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ "0"\\0 CUR = 1 LEN = \d+ MAGIC = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_envelem MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_envelem\(e\) (?: MG_FLAGS = 0x01 TAINTEDDIR )? MG_LEN = -?\d+ MG_PTR = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ (?:"(?i:PATH)"|=> HEf_SVKEY (?: ALLOCATED at .*? )? SV = PV(?:IV)?\(0x[[:xdigit:]]+\) at 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ REFCNT = \d+ FLAGS = \(TEMP,POK,(?:FAKE,READONLY,)pPOK\) (?: IV = 0 )? PV = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ "(?i:PATH)"(?:\\0)? CUR = \d+ LEN = \d+) MAGIC = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_taint MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_taint\(t\) ] not ok 21 > [-.lib.ExtUtils.t]Manifest.t............FAILED 26 29 > [-.lib.ExtUtils.t]PL_FILES.t............FAILED 3-7 > [-.lib.ExtUtils.t]basic.t...............FAILED 67 69 71 74 Patches for these have been posted here and there. I can collect them and get them into blead if there's a chance they'll get into maint before another MakeMaker release. > [-.lib.File]Copy.t......................FAILED 20 #26396 should fix that. > op/cmp.t................................FAILED ?? > op/exec.t...............................FAILED 17 Hmm. These pass when run individually and do not fail in blead. Dunno what's going on. > op/goto.t...............................FAILED 53-54 #26396 should take care of that one too. > pod/pod2usage2.t........................FAILED 2-3 5-13 15 #26710 gets that one off our list -- ________________________________________ Craig A. Berry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] "... getting out of a sonnet is much more difficult than getting in." Brad Leithauser