At 2:40 AM -0600 1/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Automated smoke report for 5.8.7 patch 26746
>BRIANA: Digital Personal WorkStation (Alpha/1 cpu)
> on openvms - V8.2
> using CC/DECC version 70190015
> smoketime 9 hours 48 minutes (average 4 hours 54 minutes)
>
>Summary: FAIL(F)
>[perlio]
> [-.ext.Devel.Peek.t]Peek.t..............FAILED 21
Hmm. My brain is not parsing the difference between got and expected:
got:
[
SV = PVMG(0x34ee30) at 0x367210
REFCNT = 1
FLAGS = (GMG,SMG,RMG,pIOK,pPOK)
IV = 0
NV = 0
PV = 0x43c0f8 "0"\0
CUR = 1
LEN = 4
MAGIC = 0x439d90
MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_envelem
MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_envelem(e)
MG_FLAGS = 0x01
TAINTEDDIR
MG_LEN = -2
MG_PTR = 0x3eaad8 => HEf_SVKEY
SV = PV(0x336100) at 0x3eaad8
REFCNT = 2
FLAGS = (TEMP,POK,pPOK)
PV = 0x43f610 "PATH"\0
CUR = 4
LEN = 8
MAGIC = 0x43ef58
MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_taint
MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_taint(t)
]
expected:
[
(?:ALLOCATED at .*?
)?SV = PVMG\(0x[[:xdigit:]]+\) at 0x[[:xdigit:]]+
REFCNT = 1
FLAGS = \(GMG,SMG,RMG,pIOK,pPOK\)
IV = 0
NV = 0
PV = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ "0"\\0
CUR = 1
LEN = \d+
MAGIC = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+
MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_envelem
MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_envelem\(e\)
(?: MG_FLAGS = 0x01
TAINTEDDIR
)? MG_LEN = -?\d+
MG_PTR = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ (?:"(?i:PATH)"|=> HEf_SVKEY
(?: ALLOCATED at .*?
)? SV = PV(?:IV)?\(0x[[:xdigit:]]+\) at 0x[[:xdigit:]]+
REFCNT = \d+
FLAGS = \(TEMP,POK,(?:FAKE,READONLY,)pPOK\)
(?: IV = 0
)? PV = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+ "(?i:PATH)"(?:\\0)?
CUR = \d+
LEN = \d+)
MAGIC = 0x[[:xdigit:]]+
MG_VIRTUAL = &PL_vtbl_taint
MG_TYPE = PERL_MAGIC_taint\(t\)
]
not ok 21
> [-.lib.ExtUtils.t]Manifest.t............FAILED 26 29
> [-.lib.ExtUtils.t]PL_FILES.t............FAILED 3-7
> [-.lib.ExtUtils.t]basic.t...............FAILED 67 69 71 74
Patches for these have been posted here and there. I can collect
them and get them into blead if there's a chance they'll get into
maint before another MakeMaker release.
> [-.lib.File]Copy.t......................FAILED 20
#26396 should fix that.
> op/cmp.t................................FAILED ??
> op/exec.t...............................FAILED 17
Hmm. These pass when run individually and do not fail in blead.
Dunno what's going on.
> op/goto.t...............................FAILED 53-54
#26396 should take care of that one too.
> pod/pod2usage2.t........................FAILED 2-3 5-13 15
#26710 gets that one off our list
--
________________________________________
Craig A. Berry
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"... getting out of a sonnet is much more
difficult than getting in."
Brad Leithauser