There were plans at one time, and a few people had gotten together quite
the initial discussion on the topic.  If I remember correctly, Andrew
Van Der Stock was involved.  Please forgive me... I don't remember the
names of everyone involved.  I believe Glenn Mabbutt weighed in, and
perhaps Scott Best.  I'm pretty sure the project had a space on
sourceforge.  I just wish I could remember the name of the project. 
I've been wondering for over a year what happened to this project.  Late
in 2000, there was much discussion about it, then, poof!

I've looked through the mailing archives, searching for sourceforge and
there aren't any references that go back that far.  And I don't have
time to read the October/November/December 2000 archives.  Sorry.

What ever did happen with this project, anyway?

 - John

>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>Subject: Best VNC?
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:55:25 +0000
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I've been using the Real VNC for about 4 months now, and think its a
great bit of software for remote admin, its installed on 150
>>workstations, and means I don't have to walk all around the
warehouse. But after reading some of the posts on this list I thought
maybe
>>I should 'upgrade' to something more secure, over our network.
>>
>>Which flavour of VNC is most secure? Tridia, Tight, esvnc, this new
Ultra vnc, or use what I have, but ssh tunnel it?
>>
>>We also have some laptops, that our reps user, so I've been
installing tight vnc 1.2.6 on them, as it gives better compression, so
when
>>we connect to them over modem its faster.
>>
>>Is there a version that is both secure, and gives better
compression?
>>
>>Also can anyone get to http://www.tightvnc.org or
http://ultravnc.sourceforge.net both seem to be down!
>Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:12:38 +0000
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>From: Alex Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Best VNC?
>
>We also have some laptops, that our reps user, so I've been installing

>tight vnc 1.2.6 on them,
>
>1.2.7 is available.
>
>Is there a version that is both secure, and gives better compression?
>
>According to all the documentation I've been reading over the past few

>days, VNC itself isn't secure, nor are there plans to integrate 
>security. I've just managed to get it working using SSH tunnelling. A

>few minutes ago I read about another product called Zebedee which,
while 
>nowhere near as comprehensive as SSH, claims to provide encrypted
TCP/IP 
>tunnels.
>
>Also can anyone get to http://www.tightvnc.org or
>
>Try http://www.tightvnc.com/ 
>
>Hope this helps.
>-- 
>Alex Morris
>
>--__--__--




This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended 
for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action 
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

Reply via email to