the list server automatically removes any attachments. I haven't been following your posts, but if this is something you would like to share it would be nice if you could find a place on the web to store/serve it so that others may download it.
Jacob Hoover At 11:50 AM 6/3/2003 -0600, Jessica Blank wrote:
Woops. Forgot to attach the tarball. Here we go!
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jessica Blank wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Bill Cassady wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jessica Blank wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 22:40:29 -0600 (MDT)
> >
> > > Hi! OK, so now I've finally compiled RealVNC under Mac OS X.
> >
> > Gee, it sure would be nice if you told list members how you finally
> > managed to do that. It might save someone else some
> > trouble/inquiries/responses...
>
> Read back, there's a whole thread on the list about this :)
>
> Attached is a little tarball, it's not really a "patch"... just untar it
> into the "vncviewer" source dir and compile as usual. All it basically
> does is remove one level of macro expansion. Instead of making GET_PIXEL a
> pointer (or whatever) to GET_PIXEL_8, GET_PIXEL_16 and GET_PIXEL_32, one
> inserts the text of GET_PIXEL_(8|16|32) directly into three separate
> versions of hextile.c (hextile8.c, hextile16.c, hextile32.c) and modifies
> rfbproto.c accordingly...
>
> >
> > ...before you request more assistance.
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > > ...now, how can I compile it STATICALLY, so I can distribute it to others
> > > without having to worry if they are tech-savvy enough to install whatever
> > > libs are needed?
> > >
> > > I've tried all sorts of muckety-mucking about with the various *FLAGS
> > > variables in configure.in and in the Makefiles... I cannot produce a
> > > static vncviewer binary.
> > >
> > > Can someone help me please?
> > >
> > > And please, no lectures on why static linking is a Bad Thing. I've heard
> > > it a trillion times. But try telling that to the newbie who says
> > > "durrrrrh, it no worky", and when you get them to run it from the shell
> > > (if you can talk them through that much), they say "durrrrrh, it say
> > > somefin' about libFOO dot ess-oh dot ... durrrrh, what id dat?"...
> > >
> > > Sorry, sometimes it's worth it to statically link. Like when releasing
> > > something to the public. I love it when projects offer BOTH static and
> > > dynamic binaries...
> > >
> > > Anyhow. Can someone help me? Again, please, no lectures.
> > >
> > > J e s s i c a L e a h B l a n k
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ;)
> > _______________________________________________
> > VNC-List mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To remove yourself from the list visit:
> > http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
> >
>
> J e s s i c a L e a h B l a n k
>
> [demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/x-gzip which had a name of vncviewer-3.3.7-macosx-patch.tar.gz]
> _______________________________________________
> VNC-List mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To remove yourself from the list visit:
> http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
>
J e s s i c a L e a h B l a n k
[demime 0.99d.1 removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/x-gzip which had a name of vncviewer-3.3.7-macosx-patch.tar.gz]
_______________________________________________
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
_______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
