I think the "paid for" version (Enterprise) is charging for the encryption and security transport technologies employed. The underlying "engine" is pretty much unchanged, although there are some better features available, for example, the scaling options for the viewer.
Erik Soderquist wrote: >yes, a GPL vet would be a nice addition to these comments. in lieu of >that, have a lawyer pick through it, and keep copies of all attempted >correspondence with RealVNC. at minimum, you could then show you acted >in good faith. > >I believe you are fine, but I'm not a lawyer. > >on a related note, I'm curious how the "not free" version is able to not >be released entirely under GPL since it is derived from the free >version. am I missing something? probably... > > -- Mark Jacobs http://www.dkcomputing.co.uk _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
