I am not really surprised. Most of the mailing lists I subscribe to exhibit this type of behavior. My $.02 -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joseph A. Knapka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Reply-To: (was Re: VNC via dial-up networking ?) My apologies for spamming the list with my previous reply to Mark's message. Apparently all vnc-list messages come with a "Reply-To" setting of "vnc-list", which I did not notice at the time. Why is this the case? Personally I expect my MUA's "Reply" function to reply to the author and "Reply All" to reply to the list, and the "Reply-To:" header does great violence to my expectations. Of course I will keep this characteristic of vnc-list in mind in the future, but I wonder if others are surprised by this behavior? $.02 -- Joe Mark Graves wrote: > > I think I'm getting warmer ... If I run VNC Viewer on the RAS server, it > works fine and I can control the dialled-in PC, but if I run VNC Viewer > on my PC on the same network (logged-in to the same domain), I cannot > connect. Is there some way to do this from my PC ? Help appreciated. -- Joe Knapka --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
