I think it's a little presumptuous to make an assumption about the
enumeration of the universe of vnc-supported systems and then proceed to
invoke Pareto's principle as if that assumption was the unqualified and
uncontested truth. If and when I roll vnc out to my total user base, I
will have approximately 850 clients running the product. Most of these
clients will utilize the internet for connectivity, so security _is_ an
issue for me.
Davis Habermann wrote:
>Most of us using VNC probably only have a few potential client machines
for
>our server. For example, I've got three machines at the office and three
>machines at home that we use VNC with. All are within our immediate
>control. Are we going to hold up this entire project to handle the last
5%
>of the users, or go for the "80-20 rule solution". (No big deal either
way
>for me, as I'm already using OpenSSH to encrypt/compress all connections.)
>
>Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
