>>>>> "TAJ" == Todd A Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TAJ> Am I correct in assuming that I will take an unnecessary
TAJ> performance hit if I run tight encoding over an ssh tunnel
TAJ> with compression enabled? Ordinarily, I would think that
TAJ> would simply try to recompress already-compressed data, but
TAJ> I'm not sure if that's the case here.
Yes, that is mostly the case.
TAJ> Should I disable compression for the ssh tunnel, or leave it
TAJ> alone?
In may be better to disable compression in SSH. Compression in tight
encoding is more efficient than pure zlib comression in SSH. However,
latencies added by SSH compression are not likely to be notable,
especially when the connection is slow, so it's not a problem to
enable both tight encoding and SSH compression. Try to experiment with
this; results will depend on your particular situation (connection
speed, CPU performance etc.).
--
With Best Wishes,
Constantin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
