> My Dear Rodney,
Valentine's Day was yesterday ...
> May I humbly suggest that if you wish to be snotty that you at least read
> the posting?
Good point.
It would also have helped if I'd paid attention to the "To:" line. I should
not have sent that message to the entire list, and for that I apologize. I
should have been snotty in private.
> I've found from long observation that it's ever so much more
> fun to be snotty when you are also correct - being an idiot takes a lot of
> the fun out of being snotty.
True, it especially takes the fun out if it for the person being an idiot and
snotty ...
> Of course I know how to get to the bottom of the posting and of course I
> know how to get off of the list. And yes, my attention span appears to be
> at least a little bit longer than yours.
That would appear to be the case.
> What I was referring to and what you were too busy being snotty to read was
> the very droll and very funny posting someone made recently that gave a
> very long and involved technique - probably something left over from
> gowning up for a clean room, or something similar - that was an obvious
> spoof. That's the posting I was asking for.
Yes, it's great, and I saved it somewhere. If I can find it I'll send it
along.
> BTW, my apologies. I tried ever so hard to take the 'soft answer turneth
> away wrath" approach, but it just didn't work!
No problem. I can't complain. I was wrong.
Rodney
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
