I am familiar with SVNC, and in fact use it on a workstation at my
office. But, SVNC still requires SVGALib, and its associated configuration
hassles. I think a version of VNC viewer that use the Linux frame buffer
instead of an add on library, would make for a cleaner (and more easily
configured) unit, and would take less space, since additional libraries are
not needed.
j----- k-----
At 02:28 PM Wednesday 2/21/2001 -0800, you allegedly said:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joshua J. Kugler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 1:31 PM
>Subject: Re: kernel hooks
>
>
> > But if you write a frame buffer version for Linux, then you wouldn't need
> > anything besides a kernel with frame buffer support compiled in. Could
> > make for a VERY small kernel, if you didn't include anything but network
> > support and support for a few network cards.
> >
> > j----- k-----
>
>You might be interested in this link:
>http://www.ugr.es/~ama/compro/svncv/
>
>I got there from here (the main Linux Router Project page, kind of):
>http://lrp.c0wz.com/
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
>to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
Joshua J. Kugler
Computer Consultant--Web Developer
.--- --- ... .... ..- .- -.- ..- --. .-.. . .-.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ#:13706295
Every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess, in heaven, on earth, and
under the earth, that Jesus Christ is LORD -- Count on it!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
