"Scott C. Best" wrote:
> 
> Raji:
>         Hello! As Harmen wrote, I'm a big fan of:
> 
> > http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html
<...> 
> As Harmen suggested, for
> something noisy like VNC, follow the README example for
> choosing a good buffer-size. If your IT guys at work ever
> complain, ask for SSH to be permitted instead. :)
> 
>         Good luck!
> 
> -Scott

Hope I didn't leave the impression that it's wrong to use VNC through a
HTTP proxy...

It's just that the particular firewall tunneling method that has to be
used for restricted Java applets, requires a http POST requests whenever
there's data to be send from client to server, imposing huge workloads
on a http proxy with VNC.

I know little about httptunnel, but I can guess what it does, and tail
my proxy logs while using it.

httptunnel, will just use 1 GET and 1 POST requests for all data both
ways, so the overhead will be low, and the're won't be a lot of logging
to do for a http proxy. So using it with VNC is OK.

However: setting a buffersize with httptunnel (when using a buffering
http proxy) will get you multiple POST requests for sending data = more
overhead. So you should only set a buffer when your http proxy requires
this.

Using httptunnel with a buffering http proxy with VNC is not a good
idea, IMHO.

Harmen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to