We already use RFB version 4.x in some of our projects. We're now developing version 5.0 of the protocol which is a substantial change from the version 3 protocols. It would be good to coordinate over what version number you choose for your new protocol so that we don't release incompatible protocols which claim to be the same version number. That would be bad :-) Cheers Tristan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
- RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Andrew van der Stock
- Re: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted David TAILLANDIER
- RE: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Chris Smith
- Re: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Jonathan Morton
- RE: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Tristan Richardson
- RE: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Erlichmen, Shay
- Re: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Jonathan Morton
- Re: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Andrew van der Stock
- RE: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Stig A. Olsen
- Re: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Andrew van der Stock
- RE: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Sharma, Shashi
- Re: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Andrew van der Stock
- Re: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Bryan A. Pendleton
- RE: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted David Brodbeck
- RE: RFB Protocol 4.0 - encodings wanted Stig A. Olsen
