hey again,

there is also this protocol being developed by the working groups which may be
of vital interest

http://www.web3d.org/WorkingGroups/vrtp/

the virtual reality transfer protocol




On Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:28:29 -0500, John Stewart said:

> Hi Miriam;
>  
>  > Hmmm... does multicast work over ordinary internet connections -- dial-ups
>  > that most people have? I had a funny feeling that it required connection to
>  > the backbone (I am actually not totally sure what that even is :)
>  
>  Well, there are 2 ways of answering this, so I'll answer both.
>  
>  1) Multicast is "being deployed". It is getting better and better; and
>  protocols
>  exist that allow one to multicast over dialup (a simplification...
>  but...)
>  
>  2) For one of our projects, when we had multicast problems over the
>  atlantic,
>  a German colleague set up what is called a "packet reflector", which is
>  kind
>  of a repeater station; you point yourself at this, and any traffic that 
>  anyone sends gets repeated to everyone else. It actually worked very
>  well,
>  much better than multicast across the atlantic.
>  
>  This repeater can be part of the multicast group, and just send/receive
>  packets to non-multicast enabled hosts. The repeater also is different
>  than a server, in that there is no state information stored. It is
>  simply 
>  a "send and forget" type of service.
>  
>  Does this help? 
>  
>  Also, as Dr. Frog states in another email message, there is also a
>  project
>  in France that multicasts virtual worlds, and I have heard of others,
>  too.
>  I guess that I am partial to VNet, and thus have the desire to take the
>  VIP
>  and multicast that. :-)
>  
>  John. 
>  
>  
>  > If it does allow connection between common dial-ups then this is probably
>  > the way we should be pushing. From my understanding of multicast it uses a
>  > packet that isn't addressed to one individual, but to a group of people, so
>  > each "server" only has to send one packet to all people receiving. And all
>  > people "subscribing" to that address receive it. This is a great saving for
>  > each machine.
>  
>  

Reply via email to