Hey
all (and 'Hi' Bruce)
Just
so you know I'll prolly poke my nose down the hall and think about these
revisions with Jeff (or at least he asked me too). Using the Shout3D stuff
would be very interesting I'll take a pop over there. Also I think on the
revision list when Jeff and I talked about it was support for EAI v2 as well as
v1 (Jeff did we opt for a command line switch or autodetect per client? can't
remember).
I
wonder if we could make it work with Shockwave 3D ? VNet Xtra... hmmmm....
thoughts. Interesting concept to mess about with. I'm not sure if we want
to integrate support for the X3D stuff coming out of the WG's now, I'm not sure
how stable that stuff is, or if anyone is developing against it in production (
?? )
Anayway, interesting suggestion. I have my own thoughts
on bandwidth and efficiency I'll post sometime soon, still noodling through
them. I think I have some ideas with the firewall audience as well, I have
to test this and see if it works. Take care all =)
-A
Phelps
RIT
-----Original Message-----We chose to attach VNET to the Shout3D and Anfy3D clients, much lighter
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 6:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Vnet Revisions and bandwidth efficiency
weight solution than trying to connect VNET to a VRML browser, and the all
java solutions dont require installation and have adequate framerates for
small meeting spaces (it can be tried out at www.meet3d.com)
Just my two cents Bruce,
Bruce Damer
