Send VoiceOps mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of VoiceOps digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: 8 Port ATA (Robert Dawson)
   2. Re: 8 Port ATA (Darren Schreiber)
   3. Re: 8 Port ATA (Keith LeClaire)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:01:20 +0000
From: Robert Dawson <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA
Message-ID:
        <97fd7852fe688d4788aaee803025acef1ff...@exchange.alliedtelecom.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I second the TA 908 - They do work well.

SPA 8000 is OK if you are using t.38. One thing to bear in mind, the SPA only 
supports one t.38 session per pair of ports. Also, per the documentation, the 
Adtran TA series only supports 4 concurrent t.38 sessions regardless of the 
model.

I have also used Innomedia's 8 port IAD successfully and they apparently 
support t.38 sessions up to the full port density.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Matthew Crocker
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA


Adtran TA 908 ??  Probably overkill but it works and works well

--
Matthew S. Crocker
President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710

E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
P: (413) 746-2760
F: (413) 746-3704
W: http://www.crocker.com



On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:42 PM, "Nick Olsen" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


We've used the Cisco/Linksys SPA-8000's And haven't liked them to much.

Anyone have any recommendations on an 8 port FXS ATA?
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED  x106

[http://www.flhsi.com/files/emaillogo.jpg]
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20121116/64afa1ac/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:35:29 -0800
From: Darren Schreiber <[email protected]>
To: Robert Dawson <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Curious? Anyone ever use a Grandstream 8-port ATA (GXW4108)?

The HT-286 has been horrible, the HT-502/503 have worked surprisingly well 
actually for us?


From: Robert Dawson 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2012 12:01 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA

I second the TA 908 ? They do work well.

SPA 8000 is OK if you are using t.38. One thing to bear in mind, the SPA only 
supports one t.38 session per pair of ports. Also, per the documentation, the 
Adtran TA series only supports 4 concurrent t.38 sessions regardless of the 
model.

I have also used Innomedia?s 8 port IAD successfully and they apparently 
support t.38 sessions up to the full port density.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew Crocker
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:49 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA


Adtran TA 908 ??  Probably overkill but it works and works well

--
Matthew S. Crocker
President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710

E: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
P: (413) 746-2760
F: (413) 746-3704
W: http://www.crocker.com



On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:42 PM, "Nick Olsen" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


We've used the Cisco/Linksys SPA-8000's And haven't liked them to much.

Anyone have any recommendations on an 8 port FXS ATA?
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED  x106

[http://www.flhsi.com/files/emaillogo.jpg]
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20121116/7fdbbb6f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:45:22 -0500
From: Keith LeClaire <[email protected]>
To: Darren Schreiber <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

We've used the GXW4108 for some time now internally to connect SIP trunks to 
our Nortel PBX and its worked very well for that. We also have it deployed at a 
few other customer sites for trials. The 502/503's are definitely much better 
than the 286's we have them (the 50X) widely deployed for our 
residential/single line customers.

-Keith


On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Darren Schreiber wrote:

> Curious? Anyone ever use a Grandstream 8-port ATA (GXW4108)?
> 
> The HT-286 has been horrible, the HT-502/503 have worked surprisingly well 
> actually for us?
> 
> 
> From: Robert Dawson <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, November 16, 2012 12:01 PM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA
> 
> I second the TA 908 ? They do work well.
>  
> SPA 8000 is OK if you are using t.38. One thing to bear in mind, the SPA only 
> supports one t.38 session per pair of ports. Also, per the documentation, the 
> Adtran TA series only supports 4 concurrent t.38 sessions regardless of the 
> model.
>  
> I have also used Innomedia?s 8 port IAD successfully and they apparently 
> support t.38 sessions up to the full port density.
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Matthew Crocker
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] 8 Port ATA
>  
>  
> Adtran TA 908 ??  Probably overkill but it works and works well
>  
> --
> Matthew S. Crocker
> President
> Crocker Communications, Inc.
> PO BOX 710
> Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
> 
> E: [email protected]
> P: (413) 746-2760
> F: (413) 746-3704
> W: http://www.crocker.com
>  
>  
>  
> On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:42 PM, "Nick Olsen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> We've used the Cisco/Linksys SPA-8000's And haven't liked them to much.
> 
> Anyone have any recommendations on an 8 port FXS ATA?
> 
> Nick Olsen
> Network Operations
> (855) FLSPEED  x106
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>  
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20121116/7595a707/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops


End of VoiceOps Digest, Vol 41, Issue 18
****************************************

Reply via email to