Send VoiceOps mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of VoiceOps digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Looking for a SIP 48 port FXS gateway (Jason L. Nesheim)
2. Re: Parsing VoIP attacker Twitter feed (Brian R)
3. Catching alot of attempts at fraud to Israel.... (David Thompson)
4. Re: Catching alot of attempts at fraud to Israel....
(Alex Balashov)
5. Re: Catching alot of attempts at fraud to Israel....
(Ujjval Karihaloo)
6. Global Crossing Auto Funds Management (AFM) system (Stagg Shelton)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:26:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Jason L. Nesheim" <[email protected]>
To: Sanjay Srinivasan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Looking for a SIP 48 port FXS gateway
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
If it really must be 48 ports in a single gateway device, you could also use
the Cisco ISR G2s (2900, 3900 series) with the high density analog module.
Using that you can achieve over 96FXS in a single device. It's an expensive
option, but it works well in deployments where it's a requirement to have a
single box solution at the site. Outside of that, is there a driver for not
using two 24 port units at a lower cost?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10536/prod_series_comparison.html
--
Jason Nesheim
+1-702-885-0815
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shripal Daphtary" <[email protected]>
To: "Sanjay Srinivasan" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 10:31:56 AM
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Looking for a SIP 48 port FXS gateway
I think the carrier access adit 600 does 40 or 48 port. Carrier access was
bought by force10 then dell bought force10. So it might me the dell adit 600.
In any case you can prob get them on eBay for a couple hundred bucks.?
Shripal Daphtary
On May 15, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Sanjay Srinivasan < [email protected] >
wrote:
Anybody have recommendation for a 48 port FXS gateway (SIP)? I have been using
the AudioCodes series but don?t believe they have a 48 port version.
?
SANJAY?SRINIVASAN ??|?? CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
Anywhere?(480) 385-7062?|?Fax?(480) 385-7007?|? [email protected]
Telesphere?|?9237 E. Via de Ventura, Ste 250?|?Scottsdale,?AZ?85258
<image001.jpg>
<image002.jpg>
<image003.png>
<image004.png>
<image005.png>
<image006.png>
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are
present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or
damage arising from the use of this email or attachments. Any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of Telesphere.
?
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 13:37:08 -0700
From: Brian R <[email protected]>
To: "J. Oquendo" <[email protected]>, voiceops
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Parsing VoIP attacker Twitter feed
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thank you for this. One of our Linux guys helped me out getting it working.
He also made some changes so I figured I'd update here. I noticed i needed to
install mawk and gawk to get it to work.
wget -qO - http://www.twitter.com/efensive |\
awk '/VoIP/ {print gensub(".*>", "", "G", $3)}'
Brian
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 09:41:31 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [VoiceOps] Parsing VoIP attacker Twitter feed
>
> Sorry had to start a new thread (Thunderbird filters via
> MS + FreeBSD aren't playing nicely). For those wanting to
> parse out, this is what I would do if I had to/wanted to
> capture from the feed: (one liner)
>
> wget -qO - http://www.twitter.com/efensive |\
> awk '/VoIP/{print $3}'|sed 's:>: :g'|awk '{print $2}'
>
> If you wanted to add to say iptables:
>
> wget -qO - http://www.twitter.com/efensive |\
> awk '/VoIP/{print $3}'|sed 's:>: :g'|sort -u |\
> awk '{print "iptables -A INPUT -s "$2" -j DROP"}'
>
> Which is a simple iptable rule:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -s x.x.x.x -j DROP
>
> I run something similar out of my crontabs @ 15 on the hou
> to parse out unique addresses. I would never bother to
> use REJECT since it wastes time/resources telling an
> attacker: "I'm REJECTING this packet" YMMV.
>
> The reasoning for grep'ing ('/VoIP/' in awk) is that every
> once in a while I may babble on, or post say APT (the big
> bad Chinese/German/Russian boogeyman) threats in my stream
> as well as malware related hosts/domains as well. This
> ensures that you only get information pertaining to VoIP
> based attackers.
>
> --
> =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
> J. Oquendo
> SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT, RWSP, GREM
>
> "Where ignorance is our master, there is no possibility of
> real peace" - Dalai Lama
>
> 42B0 5A53 6505 6638 44BB 3943 2BF7 D83F 210A 95AF
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2BF7D83F210A95AF
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20130515/29830085/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:11:21 -0700
From: David Thompson <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VoiceOps] Catching alot of attempts at fraud to Israel....
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
I?m catching a lot of attempts at fraud to Israel has anyone else out there
been catching any? Country code is 972.
David Thompson
Network Services Support Technician
(O) 858.357.8794
(F) 858-225-1882
(E) [email protected]
(W) www.esi-estech.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20130515/de5b0ddd/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 18:14:23 -0400
From: Alex Balashov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Catching alot of attempts at fraud to
Israel....
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
I've been hearing a lot about this on another forum and the conclusion
there seemed to be that it was nearly all Palestinian codes.
On 05/15/2013 06:11 PM, David Thompson wrote:
> I?m catching a lot of attempts at fraud to Israel has anyone else out
> there been catching any? Country code is 972.
>
> David Thompson
> Network Services Support Technician
> (O) 858.357.8794
> (F) 858-225-1882
> (E) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> (W) www.esi-estech.com <http://www.esi-estech.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:04:40 -0600
From: Ujjval Karihaloo <[email protected]>
To: Alex Balashov <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Catching alot of attempts at fraud to
Israel....
Message-ID: <-8830870113039667310@unknownmsgid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Gaza - is what we have seen last few weeks.
Ujjval K
On May 15, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Alex Balashov <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've been hearing a lot about this on another forum and the conclusion there
> seemed to be that it was nearly all Palestinian codes.
>
> On 05/15/2013 06:11 PM, David Thompson wrote:
>
>> I?m catching a lot of attempts at fraud to Israel has anyone else out
>> there been catching any? Country code is 972.
>>
>> David Thompson
>> Network Services Support Technician
>> (O) 858.357.8794
>> (F) 858-225-1882
>> (E) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> (W) www.esi-estech.com <http://www.esi-estech.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VoiceOps mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
>
>
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
> Suite 106
> Decatur, GA 30030
> United States
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
> _______________________________________________
> VoiceOps mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:14:31 -0400
From: Stagg Shelton <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [VoiceOps] Global Crossing Auto Funds Management (AFM) system
Message-ID:
<CALLjG-GuXEjWAntS-pqXOuYbW4vEAMSa46LpR+cLjsmR_=v...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Does anyone have any specific experiences with the Global Crossing now
Level 3 Auto Funds Management (AFM) system failing to reject calls when you
hit the lower financial limit?
Wondering how many people out there have relied on the system to perform as
a fail safe mechanism, only to find out that the AFM system failed to
reject calls when the balance reached the minimum.
I have the vibe that the system either doesn't really exist, doesn't
perform as described, or the implementation teams of the past may have
failed to implement new accounts using the system correctly.
Thanks in advance
Stagg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/voiceops/attachments/20130516/6211749a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
------------------------------
End of VoiceOps Digest, Vol 47, Issue 11
****************************************
