Have you looked at it from a call routing perspective instead of a service 
definition perspective?

Does the FCC definition of devices/services covered by this ruling match the 
set of ‘things that must have a resolvable Home Location Record to receive a 
call’?  If so, then a per-call SS7 HLR query could do the trick.

David


From: VoiceOps [mailto:voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org] On Behalf Of Carlos 
Alvarez
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 15:05
To: Glen Gerhard; voiceops@voiceops.org
Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Preventing calls to cell phones with guaranteed accuracy

I'm going to answer a number of messages at once, because there were quite a 
few replies (thanks to all of you).

NPA-NXX filtering is already being done, and is useless.  So they also employ 
list scrubbing based on what appears to be old/cached LNP info or dips, and 
that is also insufficient both legally and practically.  The data sources being 
used in the industry now do not appear to comply with the law.

For anyone who is saying that you can't determine a cell phone due to LNP, you 
are wrong.  Please look up these terms and you will see it's very possible:  
LERG, LRN, OCN  As far as cell phones that are turned into "home" service, 
that's fine, we don't care about false positives.  We just need to make sure 
that a cell number is never dialed by mistake.  And the law allows a 15 day 
grace period from porting.

On the "guarantee" that isn't something we'd provide, what I mean was simply a 
data source that is always accurate.  Such as LRN-LERG testing for every call.  
The customer will accept ultimate responsibility.

Some people recommended third-party services both on and off the list.  The one 
concern there is again, accuracy.  If the list scrubbers can't get it 
right...then any third party is suspect.  Are they using cached data?  Or 
acquiring data from dubious sources?  I don't know.



On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:31 PM Glen Gerhard 
<ggerh...@sansay.com<mailto:ggerh...@sansay.com>> wrote:
Carlos,

you can get a list of all NPA-NXXs that are used by cell carrier and use that 
as a starting point.  Then add to that the list of LRNs used by call carriers 
which may or may not be included in the first list.

Then you need to dip your traffic and compare the DNIS/LRN to the combined 
list.  If the number is ported the LRN will match the list.  If the number is 
not ported and is cellular it will be in the list of NPA-NXX.  If not cellular 
it won't match the list.

Either way if there is a match to the list then you can reject the call for 
that customer.  (I believe you are a Sansay customer so you can set up a route 
table with the combined list and then use it as the primary route table for 
those customers and then link to normal tables.  I can have our support team 
put together the list of current NPA-NXX but you'll need a LERG6 subscription 
to keep it current).

Good luck,

~Glen

PS this message is not copyrighted nor confidential ;-)




On 8/18/2015 2:14 PM, Erik Flournoy wrote:
Derek,

Is actually right. Legislation that blocks a company from auto dialing a number 
based on it being a cell phone or landline is extremely difficult to prosecute. 
Straight talk has a home service that essentially uses a wireless carrier 
backbone. I can pickup the base plug it in at my neighbors house or better yet 
put it in my car on a power inverter and wah lah my home phone is what it truly 
is a cell phone with a 110-220v power supply.  Number Portability would make 
wireline and wireless number location nearly impossible. Manual dialing would 
be the only way to prevent an auto dialer issue.

Erik Flournoy
808-426-4527
301-218-7325

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail message, including any attachments from EESPRO.com - contain 
information which is CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. The information is 
intended only for the use of the individual named above and may not be 
disseminated to any other party without written permission. If you are not the 
intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, disclosure, distribution, copying or taking of any action in 
reliance on the contents of this e-mailed information is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify 
i<mailto:i...@eespro.com>n...@eespro.com<mailto:n...@eespro.com>, and 
permanently delete this e-mail and the attachments hereto, if any, and destroy 
any printout thereof.

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Derek Andrew 
<derek.and...@usask.ca<mailto:derek.and...@usask.ca>> wrote:
Isn't it impossible to decide if a number is a cell phone or a land line 
because of local number portability?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Matthew Crocker 
<matt...@corp.crocker.com<mailto:matt...@corp.crocker.com>> wrote:


Depending on your switch you should be able to build a profile for the customer 
and reject calls going to cell phone LRN providers.

Personally, I wouldn’t take on the liability of guaranteeing their auto-dialer 
only calls landlines.   You would end up being sued if you make a mistake.  
IMHO, let them manually dial or find a list scrubbing company that actually 
works.

—

Matthew Crocker
President - Crocker Communications, Inc.
Managing Partner - Crocker Telecommunications, LLC
E: matt...@corp.crocker.com<mailto:matt...@corp.crocker.com>
E: matt...@crocker.com<mailto:matt...@crocker.com>

On Aug 18, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Carlos Alvarez 
<caalva...@gmail.com<mailto:caalva...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I have a customer in market research who is legally required to manually dial 
calls to cell phones.  Right now they are considering abandoning all of their 
auto/predictive dialer software and going to manual dial for everything, 
because the list-scrubbing services have been shown to be inaccurate.  There 
are extreme penalties for auto-dialing a cell phone, and "best effort" is NOT a 
defense to this, at all.  For example, Gallup just settle a claim for $12M.

So they need a totally accurate way to prevent a cell phone call from 
originating from their dialer.  The only thing I can think of is some sort of 
LRN dip + LRN-to-carrier-type response.  One of their people talked to Neustar, 
but didn't get great answers because he doesn't really understand telephony.  
Before I get in touch with Neustar, I thought I'd see if people here have some 
ideas.

If you provide a commercial product for this, please feel free to tell me so on 
or off list, the customer is willing to pay for the service and we're open to 
all options.  I don't have a budget number yet but manual dialing is going to 
cost them quite a bit for some types of studies.

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_voiceops&d=AwMFaQ&c=N13-TaG7c-EYAiUNohBk74oLRjUiBTwVm-KSnr4bPSc&r=f4_TiUNNJLT30vbsuVlGA9jtqz7Cz57JEfJz4VS8Kdo&m=RIBB18wTJVi1YZG7buJDLEPgUDdod-__52vUX-p3jNY&s=SksAHa3krbpM4pIOIdM5Cq9pIRELdrP7kgfaJgJDF3o&e=>




--
Copyright 2015 Derek Andrew (excluding quotations)

University of Saskatchewan

Typed but not read.

[http://homepage.usask.ca/dfa878/uofs.gif]

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_voiceops&d=AwMFaQ&c=N13-TaG7c-EYAiUNohBk74oLRjUiBTwVm-KSnr4bPSc&r=f4_TiUNNJLT30vbsuVlGA9jtqz7Cz57JEfJz4VS8Kdo&m=RIBB18wTJVi1YZG7buJDLEPgUDdod-__52vUX-p3jNY&s=SksAHa3krbpM4pIOIdM5Cq9pIRELdrP7kgfaJgJDF3o&e=>



_______________________________________________

VoiceOps mailing list

VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_voiceops&d=AwMFaQ&c=N13-TaG7c-EYAiUNohBk74oLRjUiBTwVm-KSnr4bPSc&r=f4_TiUNNJLT30vbsuVlGA9jtqz7Cz57JEfJz4VS8Kdo&m=RIBB18wTJVi1YZG7buJDLEPgUDdod-__52vUX-p3jNY&s=SksAHa3krbpM4pIOIdM5Cq9pIRELdrP7kgfaJgJDF3o&e=>

_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org<mailto:VoiceOps@voiceops.org>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_voiceops&d=AwMFaQ&c=N13-TaG7c-EYAiUNohBk74oLRjUiBTwVm-KSnr4bPSc&r=f4_TiUNNJLT30vbsuVlGA9jtqz7Cz57JEfJz4VS8Kdo&m=RIBB18wTJVi1YZG7buJDLEPgUDdod-__52vUX-p3jNY&s=SksAHa3krbpM4pIOIdM5Cq9pIRELdrP7kgfaJgJDF3o&e=>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, notify the sender immediately by return email and delete the message 
and any attachments from your system.
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops

Reply via email to