Interesting marketing tactic! Makes them appear helpful and accrues CABS
revenue.
MARY LOU CAREY
BackUP Telecom Consulting
Office: 615-791-9969
Cell: 615-796-1111
On 2019-08-16 10:29 AM, Matthew Yaklin wrote:
I realize billing for that type of call is almost nothing now days...
but wouldn't that go from a call that has no billing charge what so
ever to a call with a tiny bill tied to it since it was answered? If
you are ATT that could add up?
Just curious since it was brought up.
MATTHEW YAKLIN
Network Engineer
FIRSTLIGHT
359 Corporate Drive │ Portsmouth, NH 03801
Mobile 603-845-5031
myak...@firstlight.net | www.firstlight.net
_This email may contain FirstLight confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed_
_not to read, disclose or otherwise use this transmission and to
immediately delete same. Delivery of this message is not intended_
_to waive any applicable privileges._
-------------------------
FROM: VoiceOps <voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org> on behalf of Mike
Hammett <voice...@ics-il.net>
SENT: Friday, August 16, 2019 11:24:05 AM
TO: Voiceops.org <voiceops@voiceops.org>
SUBJECT: [VoiceOps] AT&T Answering Misdials
I misdialed a number (312) 817-1629 and got the message, "At no
additional charge, AT&T can help you find a similar business in the
same area, since the number you called is not in service." It then
went into an IVR.
Is this common?
Does this break any automated systems?
No, I have no desire to implement this on our numbers.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
