*nod* I knew all that was required to move was the administration\operation of the database. I figured their customer-facing portals were newer and better and thus where people moved.
Who all provides those kinds of services other than iconectiv and Neustar? ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Lou Carey" <mary...@backuptelecom.com> To: "Mike Hammett" <voice...@ics-il.net> Cc: voiceops@voiceops.org Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:28:29 PM Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] iconectiv vs. Neustar It was only the administrator of the main database (NPAC Helpdesk / LTI / Granting Access to NPAC) that moved from NEUSTAR to iconectiv. Everyone still has their own systems that connect to the NPAC database and which you choose depends more on cost effectiveness than anything else. If you do less than 10 ports per month, NPAC Helpdesk is the cheapest way to go because there's no monthly fee. You only pay a "per request" fee but it's a higher amount per request. All other options have a monthly service charge with a set number of requests included. MARY LOU CAREY BackUP Telecom Consulting Office: 615-791-9969 Cell: 615-796-1111 On 2021-02-22 12:08 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > I know that the database operations moved from Neustar to iconectiv a > few years ago. > > What are the pros\cons to operationally using iconectiv vs. Neustar? > > My people are used to Neustar, but I can't help but feel behind if we > don't move to iconectiv for everything we traditionally used Neustar > for. > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops