This Twilio link actually has a lot of details including fees and what they know and don't know at this time. https://support.twilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/1260800720410-What-is-A2P-10DLC-
They make pretty clear this will not impact small businesses, but is intended to recover costs of preventing spam by charging high volume business senders and ISV's *Brandon * On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:41 AM Oren Yehezkely <oren...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. All 10DLC (a DID) will become a campaign. You would need to ask for > an exemption and to prove that your users (consumers, person to person) do > not need to e registered as a campaign. > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 12:38 PM Carlos Alvarez <caalva...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So you're saying that user to user messaging will be limited? I haven't >> seen evidence of that. >> >> The Bandwidth page says it's just for mass messaging: >> What's happening? >> >> Certain mobile carrier(s) are now adjusting the throughput caps they've >> historically enforced on local messaging for business senders, also known >> as A2P programs, while imposing new registration requirements and paying >> additional fees. The throughput limits will vary, but wanted messages in >> registered campaigns should receive better throughput than the traditional >> 1 message per second (MPS). >> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:33 AM Oren Yehezkely <oren...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I would agree if this was the case. But it is not the case. >>> That is the reason I suggest we learn more about it and fight it (if it >>> matters to you). >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 12:30 PM Carlos Alvarez <caalva...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> As I understand it, this is only about the trash mass-send messaging, >>>> and not user to user. Right? Anything that reduces business abuse of SMS >>>> is good in my opinion. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:24 AM Oren Yehezkely <oren...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, it is what they call 10DLC. Here is what Bandwidth has put >>>>> together for some more details. >>>>> >>>>> https://support.bandwidth.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500002422242-10DLC-Overview-and-FAQ >>>>> I will gather more information and post what I can find. >>>>> >>>>> Kent described it correctly and it is probably a result of the FCC not >>>>> regulating the market, which will now become the wild west. >>>>> What Kent may be missing is that it is not only extra fees (as is the >>>>> case with Verizon) but a whole registration requirement and actually >>>>> blocking of messages from unregistered DIDs, as AT&T is about to implement >>>>> their walled garden. >>>>> >>>>> If you offer SMS text messaging to your customers, you should be very >>>>> worried, and join forces to fight it. >>>>> >>>>> Oren >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 12:15 PM Ivan Kovacevic < >>>>> ivan.kovace...@startelecom.ca> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Are you referring to A2P 10DLC? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://www.startelecom.ca> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Ivan Kovacevic* >>>>>> >>>>>> *www.startelecom.ca <http://www.startelecom.ca>* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Oren Yehezkely <oren...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does anyone have some deep knowledge about AT&T and Verizon's move >>>>>>> to create their own walled gardens and prevent messages from the outside >>>>>>> world from coming in, unless they approve each and every phone number >>>>>>> (and >>>>>>> you obviously pay for that approval)? >>>>>>> Next thing they will block emails from other networks, or maybe all >>>>>>> IP traffic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Oren >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> VoiceOps mailing list >>>>>>> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> NOTE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of >>>>>> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged >>>>>> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is >>>>>> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the >>>>>> sender by replying to this email, and destroy all copies of the original >>>>>> message. >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> VoiceOps mailing list >>>>> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> VoiceOps mailing list >>>> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> VoiceOps mailing list >> VoiceOps@voiceops.org >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >> > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
