Well that is ultra crappy. I checked a couple of the problem numbers and some were showing blocked CNAM. Now, we never do this as a policy, but I figured somehow we screwed those up. Guess not. I wonder what they’d charge us if I just submit an update for all numbers.
On Feb 1, 2024 at 1:45:10 PM, Todd Wolf <tw...@wolftechgroup.com> wrote: > apparently they have started using a different ULC that has impacted CNAM > settings....we had hundreds of numbers that we needed to manual submit new > CNAM settings with them because it made them start to show as "Bandwidth" > or Private and our customers where getting there outgoing calls flagged as > potential spam by the party they were calling. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* VoiceOps <voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org> on behalf of Carlos > Alvarez via VoiceOps <voiceops@voiceops.org> > *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2024 3:16 PM > *To:* VoiceOps <voiceops@voiceops.org> > *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Spike in customers numbers showing SPAM? > > I just looked up the last few customer reports of this, and all of them > are Bandwidth numbers. > > > On Feb 1, 2024 at 12:05:25 PM, Todd Wolf <tw...@wolftechgroup.com> wrote: > > This has affected TNs we use Bandwidth for and apparently they have > changed how certain LATA are sourced for CNAM which caused them to present > as “Bandwidth” so people were reporting as SPAM.. I was told it affected There > have been changes with DIDs in LATAs 973 (Palm Springs, CA), 342 > (Marquette, MI), and 120 (Portland, ME) Rate Centers. > Sent from my iPhone > > Todd Wolf > > Wolf Technology Group > > > > On Feb 1, 2024, at 2:01 PM, Adam Miller via VoiceOps < > voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote: > > > We have seen it as well, primarily with Verizon. > > Sent via mobile > Adam Miller > SimSIP, LLC > ------------------------------ > *From:* VoiceOps <voiceops-boun...@voiceops.org> on behalf of Carlos > Alvarez via VoiceOps <voiceops@voiceops.org> > *Sent:* Thursday, February 1, 2024 12:39:25 PM > *To:* VoiceOps <voiceops@voiceops.org> > *Subject:* Re: [VoiceOps] Spike in customers numbers showing SPAM? > > Caution: This email originated from outside SimSIP, LLC. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. If this is a phishing email, please delete the message. > > We’ve had more reports of this than usual, suddenly. For us it feels more > related to T-Mobile, but I haven’t carefully tracked it. > > > On Feb 1, 2024 at 10:57:27 AM, Christopher Aloi via VoiceOps < > voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote: > > Hey All, > > Anyone else seeing a spike in customers reporting their numbers are > showing as SPAM? I have a number of customers who popped up over the last > seven days with this problem. I am also hearing some of our internal > numbers are coming up this way. It seems a lot of these calls are ending > with Verizon Wireless. My calls all have A level attestation. I am in > Upstate NY and most of these calls are as well. I have directed customers > to the free caller registry in the past, but this sudden spike feels > alarming. > > Chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops > >
Outlook-d1td3mcg
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops