Posted by Orin Kerr:
Will Technology Lead to More Crimes Being Solved, or Fewer? :

   Penn lawprof Paul Robinson, one of the best crimlaw professors in the
   country, has a very short essay up on SSRN entitled, [1]Criminal
   Justice in the Information Age: A Punishment Theory Paradox. The essay
   is a thought experiment about a possible future of criminal law, in
   which "most crimes are solved and most perpetrators caught and
   punished." Robinson doesn't claim that the future will look this way,
   only that it might. Why might it look this way? Robinson points to DNA
   testing, computers, GPS satellites, infrared cameras, and other
   technologies, and notes that all of these can be used to solve crimes.
   According to Robinson, the fact that these technologies can be used to
   solve crimes creates at least the possibility that the future will be
   one which most crimes are solved and most criminals convicted.
     I don't think that's right, though. Technology almost never works in
   a straight line like that. For every technology that makes it easier
   for the police to catch criminals, there are countertechnologies that
   make it harder for police to catch them. As DNA testing becomes more
   common, defendants will learn to control the DNA they leave at crime
   scenes -- intentionally leaving the DNA of others behind, for example.
   Computers can be used to solve crimes, but they can also allow
   defendants to commit crimes with almost total anonymity. Cameras can
   identify wrongdoers, but can also be circumvented. For every
   technology there is a countertechnology, setting off a dynamic and
   fluid cat vs. mouse came between the cops and the bad guys.
     Robinson's very interesting essay is focused mostly on the "what if"
   -- what might criminal law look like if this world were to come to
   pass? As a thought experiment, it's a very worthy and interesting one.
   As a prediction, though, I don't think it's likely that his vision of
   the Information Age will come to pass.
     Thanks to [2]CrimProf Blog for the link.

References

   1. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=183289
   2. 
http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/crimprof_blog/2005/03/new_article_spo_3.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to