Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Deliberately Painful Executions and the Slippery Slopes:

   Several people have argued that we should oppose deliberately painful
   executions because of the risk of slippery slope -- even if it's OK to
   do this to Nazis or people who rape and kill dozens of children, the
   argument goes, if it's accepted for them it will likely also broaden
   to other people, both including simple murderers and others who have
   committed still lesser crimes.

   As I've argued [1]in my Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope article,
   slippery slope effects do often happen -- but it's not enough just to
   say "what about the slippery slope?"; one has to explain the
   mechanisms that would make the slippage plausible. I point to one such
   mechanism [2]in my post about arguments against the death penalty, so
   I think this is something to worry about sometimes. But on balance, I
   think that this isn't a serious risk here: At least in the U.S., the
   last two centuries have generally seen a steady movement towards less
   painful punishments (or at least punishments billed as less painful)
   and more broadly towards a narrower and narrower set of crimes that
   can be punished by death.

   I'm sure there've been a few moves the other way, but the broad trend
   is very much in the direction I describe; and it seems to me
   politically implausible that a decision to allow painful executions
   for the most heinous of criminals would reverse this trend (though I
   think such the decision itself would be politically implausible). If I
   did think there was a serious slippery slope risk here, that would
   definitely influence my judgment.

References

   1. http://www1.law.ucla.edu/~volokh/slipperyshorter.pdf
   2. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_03_13-2005_03_19.shtml#1111183386

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to