Posted by Orin Kerr:
Scalia's Vote In Raich:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_06_05-2005_06_11.shtml#1118350645


   I've read lots of speculation in the blogosphere that Justice Scalia
   voted in the government's favor in the Gonzales v. Raich case because
   he's a social conservative who wants the government to crack down on
   drugs. If that's true, though, why did he vote in favor of the
   marijuana grower in [1]Kyllo v. United States? And why did he vote in
   favor of the crack dealer in [2]Booker v. United States? Is the idea
   that Scalia is principled when he votes in favor of defendants, but is
   just a social conservative when he votes in favor of the government?

References

   1. http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-8508.ZO.html
   2. http://straylight.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-104.ZO.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
Volokh@lists.powerblogs.com
http://highsorcery.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to