OK Petar,
 
 
But all your doing is setting up an extra step for your server to do (a lookup) .  Basically defining a forced route is Vircom's recommandation... Are there other ways? Always, but we recommend a route be defined.
 
 
Thank you
 

--
 
Charles Akkerman
Vircom Technical Support
Phone: (514) 990-2532
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Please check our website at the the following
link for the technical support holiday schedule:
http://www.vircom.com/services/index.htm
 
  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:35 PM
Subject: [VOPmail Beta] backup email server

As I said Charles, maybe what you suggest is required in theory because
I have a few systems running /without/ the forced route and they regular
spool mail for each other when machine are taken offline for maintenance.
 
Our systems have have each other listed as MX backups and each one will
accept mail for spooling when the primary mx is offline with the equiv
of accecpt for relay but I use /no/ forced routes or other directives
to cause mail re-delivery.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:08 AM
Subject: [VOPmail Beta] backup email server

Hi Petar,
 
 
Ok in the below senario:
 
___________________________________________________________________________
(                                                        INTERNET                                                                                                 )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        |                                                                        |
                                        |                                                                        |
                            (your domain1)                                           (partners domain2)
                                /              \                                                         /              \
      spool---main#1    backup#1---spool   spool---main#2               backup#2---spool            
                               \                /                                                       \                /
                             mailstorage#1                                               mailstorage#2
 
NOW, Accepting mail on a backup for your domain is quite simple as the backup is configured relatively the same as the primary, when a user receives mail, no matter which server it connects to he/she will retreive their mail as the mail always resides on the same mail storage
 
HOWEVER, in your senario, domain1 will be a backup for domain2. therefore if we say accept mail for relay to domain2.com domain, since we do not share the same mailstorage area for all our users we must create a forced route to domain2. Hence  the C).
 
Unless I misunderstood your initial e-mail I believe this is what you want.
 
SUMMARY:
 
-    Two domains 
-    Each with main and backup servers
-    Wanting to be redundant/fallback for each other meaning if domain1's servers are down,
    domain2 will be able to accept the mail.
 
In such a case each domain must have a forced route to the other to ensure that the mail is dealt
with correctly.
 
 
Thank you
-   

--
 
Charles Akkerman
Vircom Technical Support
Phone: (514) 990-2532
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Please check our website at the the following
link for the technical support holiday schedule:
http://www.vircom.com/services/index.htm
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 1:34 PM
Subject: [VOPmail Beta] backup email server

Charles,
 
Why is C) required? I have backup mail working fine with just
A) and B). Other mail servers we run also do not require a
forced route entered anywhere.
 
Kirk,
 
If you peer with anyone then I suggest your offer to secondary
for someone else and have them secondary for you in return.
This is a good policy that could also include secondary DNS
which would give your operation more uptime in event of an
network crashing accident.
 
 
..Petar
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: [VOPmail Beta] backup email server

Helo Kirk,
 
 
Yes, you can setup each others vopmails as fallbacks. All that is required of you is:
 
A)      an MX record.
B)      'accept mail to these domains'  under security must have the partners domains therein.
C)      A forced route must than be created under ROUTES.
 
NOTE: The following must be remembered/taken in consideration:
 
D)    The relaying server will be more suseptible to scan attacks since it will accept 'all' msg to @domain.com.
E)    FYI:     Ensure that both servers can handle the extra load (HARDWARE).
 
Lastly, Any difficulties just e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
Thank you
Charles Akkerman
Vircom Technical Support
Phone: (514) 990-2532
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Please check our website at the the following
link for the technical support holiday schedule:
http://www.vircom.com/services/index.htm
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Woloshyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:38 PM
Subject: [VOPmail Beta] backup email server

> * This is the vopmailbeta mailing list *
>
>
> Can a standard version of VOP be used for the backup relay? I have a
> business partner who is also running VOP. Would we be able to set up POs
> on our systems for each other with a lower priority MX and become backup
> for each other?
>
> Kirk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Barstow
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:14 AM
> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOPmail Beta] backup email server
>
>
> * This is the vopmailbeta mailing list *
>
>
> You would probably just want to use a modusGate or VOPMail Relay version
> to setup on an alternate server (other network) and just set a forced
> route for * to send all mail to your primary server.  Make this your
> lower priority (higher number) mx record in DNS so if your primary is
> offline, this server will queue mail for delivery to your primary when
> its back online.
>
>
> Jim Barstow
> Internet Network Engineer
> Local Internet Services, Inc.
> PO Box 160
> Ludington, MI 49431
> (231)845-9797 ext. 109
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Blue
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:10 PM
> To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOPmail Beta] backup email server
>
>
> * This is the vopmailbeta mailing list *
>
>
> Hey guys ..
>
> I am to the point now where I need to start thinking about a secondary
> backup email server running on another network.
>
> What setup would be the best scenario?
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  John                         
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to