I posted and Jones Beene replied;
I attempted to start a thread several weeks ago. Two physicists claim that they have developed a laser stimulation method which is isotope specific.
Are you sure they are physicists?
Yes, my friend is talking to them. One is an astrophysicist, one is a nuclear physicist, and the third is a metallurgical chemist. I told my friend that you were interested in using their methods in energy production and give him your email address.
I know it is supposed to come off as a spontaneous interview, but there are a number of such obvious errors that no high school physics student would make.
I thought they were doing good until they attempted to explain how the charged metal atoms brought about DNA
They sound more like snake oil salesmen than physicists.
I understand why you would feel that way Jones, it depends on whether or not The Water relieves the symptoms of degenerative illness. There are various indices of aging, which it is our intention to reverse, these indices are the ultimate proof of their claims.
That turned me off initially to the extent that, as my grandmother used to say, "if you can't say anything nice then don't say anything..." But you asked why, and you deserve an answer. These are not scientists.
The particular frequency charges the atoms. When two solutions of charged atoms are combined, the atoms combine. By selecting the proper atoms, one should be able to produce what ever element you want. I can think of one particular element, the production of which would allow me to finance what ever research tickled my fancy.
I can't express in words how ridiculous this sounds on its surface.
They claim to have synthesized specific isotopes of what ever elements they want to produce. They are claiming the same thing that your are, changing one element into another.
Coming from one (me) who is never shy about throwing out outlandish ideas, and doesn't mind well-directed criticism, those two should consider this assessment of their work to be especially damning... unless, of course, it is just semantic problems. Some of the better physicits are poor writers and even poorer speakers. Are there any real experiments that they can show? These don't lie. Without some basis in experiment, why waste our time?
If they hadn't claimed to be able to combine atoms, I wouldn't have posted this.
I was hoping to get some of you to read the article and tell me what you think of what they say. I'm wondering how quantum state, which I assume corresponds to the charge on the electrons correlates with a specific isotope.
Thomas, quantum mechanics is fairly complicated material and it wouldn't do it justice to try to explain it in a quick post.
I realize that. What I'm trying to understand is this; is it your opinion that the fusion of the two atoms is a result of aligning the movement of the electrons critical to initiating the fusion? Do you think that aligning the electrons is critical to overcoming the coulomb barrier?
Given the 35% efficiency of conventional> electric generating plants, that's very good. I noted with interest
Any decent flux of charged particles will be poised to give very high efficiency, because if you think about it, the moving charges are just like electrical cuurent anyway, so all one needs to do is to separate them.
Interesting way to look at it.
There's nothing like electrical production to give a no B S indication of energy output.
On that not you are exactly correct!!
This undoubtedly is the future direction for LENR researchers who want to avoid the calorimetry quicksand.
I had no idea that calorimetry was such a black art until I listened to you people talk about it.
