Hi Horace.

Sorry I haven't picked up on this; the last time
I tried to wrap my head around Bell's theorem I got
a bit lost in the nomenclature. Maybe we can hash it
out here in terms less obscure.

My understanding of all of these FTL schemes using
quantum teleportation is that some real physical event
is happening to the remote paired particle when the local
particle is detected. Yet, you are starting with the
condition that the particles be paired. This was Bertelmanns
critique; consider for example a pair of socks. We mix
up the right and left socks, and mail them off to
our two receivers. Bob opens his box, and sees he
has a left sock. Instantly, Marys sock "becomes" a
right sock, by virtue of the fact that according
to QM we can't treat the sock as right or left
until we measure it and thus it exists as a mixture
of the two states. This I see as an artifact of our
method of analysis; the using of statistics to study
a discrete real event. I am lead to understand that
Bells inequalities prove that no hidden variables exist,
but I'm wondering if there is any physical basis for
this? The sorts of experiments you are suggesting
are really to the point, if there is something physical
happening when we collapse the wave function then
some sort of FTL scheme ought to be realizable. I'm
skeptical of this only because I know from my meagre
study of statistics that the first thing that gets
thrown away in a statistical analysis is causality,
a requirement for any communication scheme. 

Do you still think one of your ideas presented earlier
on the list to be workable? 

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: Horace Heffner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 11:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTL Triad Quantum Communication Method


Ooops!  The post made sense to me at 2:30 in the morning, before going to
bed.  Now that I have awoken, I see it is nonsense!  Not an uncommon
experience for me these days.  Sorry!

The flaw is that, for Bell's inequality to be applied, Both Alice's and
Bob's individual results from observation of one photon selected at random
from each corresponding triad must be compared.  This comparison takes
place at less than light speed.  When this is done, however, the suggested
method does seem to provide a means to do an Aspect style experiment using
polarization instead of spin.  The odd thing is the importance of timing to
the result, timing which relativity says can not always be provided because
Alice and Bob's time is relative to the observer.

Regards,

Horace Heffner          



Reply via email to