In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 16 Oct 2004 05:08:54 -0800: Hi, [snip] >There is in fact no way to select from the rows of table 5 to obtain a >probability of 0.5 in Table 6. This is, in fact, what Bell's inequality >says. This was Bell's point. [snip] I'm probably missing something, but it seems to me that a probability of 0.5 is exactly what one would expect if the spins were totally random and uncorrelated, i.e. if there were no effect at all, i.e. no hidden variables, and also no entanglement whatsoever.
Regards, Robin van Spaandonk All SPAM goes in the trash unread.
