im missing the last part of the statement. provided that constant changes... wouldnt that make it a variable.
and time IS a variable, dependant upon velocity. On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 19:58:55 -0500, RC Macaulay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could we consider time as the only constant, provided that single constant > changes with everything physical? > Absurd comment ? Perhaps.. but.. maybe science gives us a glimpse but not > the vocabulary. > Perhaps we do not know how to assign a measurement to time? A clock may be a > flawed method. For those scripture buffs, an interesting story regarding the > sun's shadow on the staircase moving back may not be so absurd should > another method of measurement be discovered. > > Richard -- Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten. -G.K. Chesterton
