Horace, > Electronium should show up in NMR if the concentration can be made high
Interesting idea. This was an approach taken by Mills to find the hydrino, and although he "claims" that NMR has identified the hydrino, I have not seen this result from an independent source and really doubt that it has been successful for him or else we would have heard something more forceful. Let's say you put a Pd cathode into a NMR device, and assume that one part in a thousand of the Pd was enriched in (*e-), what would you expect to see? (just thinking out loud here) - would there be a stray peak and at what frequency variation from pure Pd ? What percentage of Pd needs to be enriched for Pd to show up unequivocally? This approach would not be difficult to pull off, if there was some way to predict what should turn up - in advance. Of course such a cathode is probably already loaded with too much other transmutation products but it might be worth a try. > It should show up on an ordinary TV tube for that matter, but only if (*e-) is not inhibited by its higher mass, so as not to become a conduction electron > It should have shown up in zillions of thoroughly computer > analysed bubble chamber pictures by now too. Yes it probably has, but the similarity with a normal electron is too close. However, I suspect that much, if not most of tracts associated with Ps decay, and written off as such, could instead be (*e-) decay. Jones
