What gets hotter - the "cold turkey" (10 degrees K)
which is put into the freezer... or the identical
turkey put into the microwave oven? 

A no-brainer unless we qualify the question to add...
IF each turkey gets the same number of characteristic
photons from its appliance? Assume the characteristic
photon of the freezer is sub-IR at minus 5 degrees C. 
and the oven photon is at a frequency of 2.45 Ghz and
no other conductive energy transfer is applicable.

Obviously from the complicated "setup" of this poser -
anyone with a bit of sophistication can guess that it
is somewhat of a "trick" question, but do they really
know why the freezer turkey heats up faster?

Chefs, like sailors, would not necessarily make good
"natural" physicists. This may be because of a
particular mind-set, which is sensory. The energy with
which sailors are accustomed to dealing, the sea,
expresses itself in a radically different way than
does the energy of physics - the photon. The longer
the ocean wave, for instance, the more powerful the
storm which caused it, and the harder it is to deal
with in a small boat. Just the opposite is true with
regard to the photon "waves."

It's interesting that the two equations most famously
associated with Einstein both assert equivalencies
involving energy: E = mc^2 and E = hn, relate energy
to two fundamental constants, lightspeed and Planck's
constant. Of course, the latter equation is really an
assertion about the partitioning of energy, since it
refers to an elemental and "unbreakable" unit (or
quantum) of energy - which is the photon. But that
ratio, and the relationship of energy to wavelength is
not the whole story in being able to maximize energy
transfer to a particular target.

A paradigm sensory shift happens in E = hn when we
deal with two different systems - one where n
(frequency) is a spectrum "spread", such as is visible
light, and the second where n is "coherent" which
means that all the photons are at *exactly* the same
n. The result of this paradigm shift being that
microwaves, which are not really heat waves, but can
be better described as "cold waves" since their photon
represents a temperature which is generally colder
than any place on earth even the arctic, BUT which can
nevertheless transfer and concentrate a lot of net
energy rapidly into an appropriate target. But this
transfer effect is more a function of "intensity" than
underlying power.  To try to verbalize this another
way, a smaller amount of "intense cold" (if coherent
and fully absorbed) can raise the temperature of a
target faster than a much larger amount randomized
heat waves, which are not efficiently absorbed.

In the case of the "cold turkey" both sub IR and
microwaves are easily fully absorbed, whereas higher
energy such as lightwaves would not be absorbed but
blocked by a surface interface. And... (getting a
little closer to the ultimate point of this post) if
we took the average "freezer photon" and made it
coherent, then that turkey would heat up incredibly
fast - like a microwave oven on steroids. Imagine
heating a frozen TV dinner in 5 seconds instead of 5
minutes - it could happen with coherent terawaves (if
not preceded by an explosion), which kind of oven,
unfortunately does not exist as a commercial resource
now.

Light (visible) is the frequency spectrum
electromagnetic wave with which are most familiar,
giving an energy per photon for which we have a
visceral understanding - i.e. sunburn. Radio waves at
the frequency of the household microwave oven are
interesting in this context, as they are far weaker -
but coherent. That is, each photon of visible light
can be a million times more energetic than the
microwave photon but we may not appreciate that in a
sensory way until the light itself becomes equally
"coherent"... as it does in a laser.

The trouble with higher frequency waves like light
which have a higher net energy, is that they may just
heat the surface, or else if really high frequency -
just pass right through your target object or reflect
off of it. X-rays, for example would go through
organic material and not be "felt" anywhere near as
intensely as IR, which we associate with heat. This is
why one often hears it said in regard to radioactive
material - if it feels "warm" you are already in deep
trouble.

All of this as a preamble to the percieved *need* for
a terahertz light source. And, as they say on the
streets, need is a mother...." or was that "necessity
is the mother of invention" ?

For the inventor out there, the motherless ones
needing a "goal" which they can immediately relate to
(such as being expressed as "$$$$" ) then just think
for a moment about this previous statement. "Imagine
heating a frozen TV dinner in 5 seconds instead of 5
minutes" - it could (?) happen with coherent
terawaves, which unfortunately do not exist as a
commercial resource now, so no one only really has
much more than a glimpse at all the potential
applications...

Not to mention the application which has currently
infatuated this particular observer... that being the
distinct possibility that terawaves, which "just"
coincidentally may happen to exist precisely at a QM
resonance point for deuterium condensation in a metal
matrix, could eventually be the "enabling technoloy"
which is required to bring LENR out of the lab and
into everyday life... 

Jones

Eat your heart out, James Burke. Did you ever imagine
that the WWW itself would be the "enabling technology"
for not just faster connections but a paradigm shift
in connections: that being "instigated connections"
(as opposed to partially random ) ... as in providing
the "enabling technology" for the free-flow of
unedited (maybe even pathological) information,
providing the "enabling technology" for allowing a few
fringe observers to suggest an "enabling technology"
for such societal needs as "faster TV diners," thus
providing the "enabling technology" (hopefully) for a
few inventors to discover a robust kind of LENR which
wll eventaually wean an increasingly dependent World
off of its unholy reliance on fossil fuels...  <G> 

... stayed tuned for that episode. I hope it is
scheduled before the twelfth ...

Reply via email to