--- Geoff Haselhurst wrote: > Will enjoy reading your posts, but will not be able > to contribute much as i have a rather large website > that is in great need of work. > Sincerely, > Geoff Haselhurst > http://www.spaceandmotion.com
Greetings, You have done a nice job on your website, and probably get way too little in the form of recognition from its world-wide audience. Thanks for keeping it going.... Many who are influenced by your work, and appreciative, will nevertheless not take the time to comment, and instead will probably "borrow" your ideas with impunity. Like the other kind of "surfing," the beneficiaries of free information-availability often take too much for granted. You may find that this group is somewhat more oriented towards presenting alternate speculation and hypothesis, which might better serve to explain anomalies, especially those in LENR (low energy nuclear reactions) rather than in supporting or developing any one theory. The group definitely seems oriented toward trying to isolate aspects of any theory (the aspects relating to energy) and trying to find ways to test that in experiment. Don't want to put you on the spot with an immediate off-the-wall question, but... The obvious unknown which many of us would have in regard to using or applying WSM to alternative energy research would be: do you see any components of WSM which can be tested experimentally, and which might lead to improvements in either extracting energy from previously unused sources, or in maximizing the way we extract energy from the common sources? Regards, Jones Beene
