Mitchell Swartz writes,

> The vacancies of current interest to me are Frenkel
defects,
> and they can also be induced by high dose rate
irradiation, as we have
> shown for years.

> There is an article which is pending or just out in Hal
Fox's J. New Energy
> showing  evidence of "lattice quakes" as the early large
number of Frenkel defects
> collapse in some of our samples.


This is most interesting, for several reasons - one being
the potential ability to engineer active materials which do
not require Pd, or at least do not require as much of it.
Certain ceramics seem like they could be good candidates.

I found some background info on the web about Frenkel
Defects for those like myself who were not up to speed on
this. Historically, point defects in crystals were first
considered in ionic crystals, but not in metal crystals. The
reason was that some known properties of ionic crystals (ion
migration at high temperatures) could be understood for the
first time in terms of point defects, while no special
properties of metals (historically) were in similar need of
an explanation, nor were there obvious uses.

Frenkel defects are usually distinguished from ionic or
Schottky defects, as there is no (or only a negligible)
*volume expansion* of the crystal when Frenkel defects are
formed. This builds in stress, which could be beneficial for
CF. Researchers with a chemical or ceramics background tend
to classify all point defects in the category "Schottky" or
"Frenkel". In this classification, Frenkel defects do not
appear in thermal equilibrium but may be produced by
energetic irradiation which transfers sufficient energy to
crystal atoms to displace atoms into adjoining interstitial
sites while at the same time creating a vacancy.

I hope that Mitchell has the time to elaborate a little
further on using Frenkel defects and whether or not he sees
this leading to alternative (cheaper) active materials for
use as an LENR matrix, and what kind of lifetime he sees for
such a cathode.

I guess (thinking aloud) that an ideal implementation would
be the kind of "warm" fusion devices with low-energy
accelerator-driven or electrostatically-driven deuterons -
which device can both create the needed defects (which are
probably fairly transitory) while at the same time provide
some or all of the EMF needed to drive the fusion
reaction.... Something along the lines of using a solid
target in a Farnsworth-type fusor at 20 keV ?

Jones



Reply via email to