Jones Beene wrote:
>
> According to Mills and I think he is correct on this one
> point, there is also a "gluon-like" particle within the
> orbit which mediates the attractive force, somewhat as in
> the nucleus. But I do understand that Fred's version of
> string theory doesn't recognize the need for a gluon either.
> We are free to disagree on that.
>
> point, there is also a "gluon-like" particle within the
> orbit which mediates the attractive force, somewhat as in
> the nucleus. But I do understand that Fred's version of
> string theory doesn't recognize the need for a gluon either.
> We are free to disagree on that.
>
Well, go ahead and disagree. :-)
A sneaky coupling mechanism allows energy sharing between (energy loops or disks) as borne
out by K electron capture, and the binding energy by the quarks in a nucleus,
where the electron energy loop gains as much as 50 MeVor more and shrinks into the nucleus
simultaneously creating a neutrino-antineutrino pair, hence turning a proton into neutron.
momentum mvr = n * hbar and energy is conserved in this coupling process.
Where else can the energy to do this come from?
I see no reason why the same process couldn't be involved with Mills' Hydrino (quasi-neutron?) state.
I think this known as mutual induction (between turns or loops).
>
> According to Mills, this "mediator" particle is a photon in
> multiples of 27.2 (13.6) eV, but one does not have to accept
> that either. Because it, whatever "it" is, it appears
> instantly and almost magically when an electron is being
> captured by a free proton... to me this means that it comes
> directly from Dirac's sea. But that is way beyond anything
> in CQM. Which is a good thing.
> multiples of 27.2 (13.6) eV, but one does not have to accept
> that either. Because it, whatever "it" is, it appears
> instantly and almost magically when an electron is being
> captured by a free proton... to me this means that it comes
> directly from Dirac's sea. But that is way beyond anything
> in CQM. Which is a good thing.
>
Particle, or magnetic field effect/s?
Frederick
