In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911

Here's another article, with some references, by British 
journalist George Monbiot.  

http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2003/07/01/shadow-of-extinction/

Subsequent articles can be found at:
http://www.monbiot.com/archives/category/climate-change/

July 1, 2003
Shadow of extinction

Only six degrees separate our world from the cataclysmic end of
an ancient era

By George Monbiot. Published in the Guardian 1st July 2003

It is old news, I admit. Two hundred and fifty-one million
years old, to be precise. But the story of what happened then,
which has now been told for the first time, demands our urgent
attention. Its implications are more profound than anything
taking place in Iraq, or Washington, or even (and I am sorry to
burst your bubble) Wimbledon. Unless we understand what happened,
and act upon that intelligence, pre-history may very soon repeat
itself, not as tragedy, but as catastrophe.

The events which brought the Permian period (between 286 and 251
million years ago) to an end could not be clearly determined
until the mapping of the key geological sequences had been
completed. Until recently, palaeontologists had assumed that
the changes which took place then were gradual and piecemeal.
But three years ago a precise date for the end of the period was
established, which enabled geologists to draw direct comparisons
between the rocks laid down at that time in different parts of
the world.

Having done so, they made a shattering discovery. In China,
South Africa, Australia, Greenland, Russia and Spitsbergen,
the rocks record an almost identical sequence of events, taking
place not gradually, but almost instantaneously. They show that
a cataclysm caused by natural processes almost brought life on
earth to an end. They also suggest that a set of human activities
which threatens to replicate those processes could exert the
same effect, within the lifetimes of some of those who are on
earth today.

As the professor of palaeontology Michael Benton records in his
new book, When Life Nearly Died, the marine sediments deposited
at the end of the Permian period record two sudden changes.1
The first is that the red or green or grey rock laid down in
the presence of oxygen is suddenly replaced by black muds of
the kind deposited when oxygen is absent. At the same time, an
instant shift in the ratio of the isotopes (alternative forms)
of carbon within the rocks suggests a spectacular change in the
concentration of atmospheric gases.

On land, another dramatic transition has been dated to precisely
the same time. In Russia and South Africa, gently deposited
mudstones and limestones suddenly give way to massive dumps of
pebbles and boulders. But the geological changes are minor by
comparison to what happened to the animals and plants.

The Permian was one of the most biologically diverse periods
in the earth's history. Herbivorous reptiles the size of rhinos
were hunted through forests of tree ferns and flowering trees by
sabre-toothed predators. At sea, massive coral reefs accumulated,
among which lived great sharks, fish of all kinds and hundreds
of species of shelly creatures.

Then suddenly there is almost nothing. The fossil record very
nearly stops dead. The reefs die instantly, and do not reappear
on earth for ten million years. All the large and medium-sized
sharks disappear, most of the shelly species, and even the great
majority of the toughest and most numerous organisms in the sea,
the plankton. Among many classes of marine animals, the only
survivors were those adapted to the near-absence of oxygen.

On land, the shift was even more severe. Plantlife was almost
eliminated from the earth's surface. The four-footed animals,
the category to which humans belong, were nearly exterminated:
so far only two fossil reptile species have been found anywhere
on earth which survived the end of the Permian. The world's
surface came to be dominated by just one of these, an animal a
bit like a pig. It became ubiquitous because nothing else was
left to compete with it or to prey upon it.

Altogether, Benton shows, some 90% of the earth's species appear
to have been wiped out: this represents by the far the gravest
of the mass extinctions. The world's "productivity" (the total
mass of biological matter) collapsed.

Ecosystems recovered very slowly. No coral reefs have been found
anywhere on earth in the rocks laid down over the following
10 million years. One hundred and fifty million years elapsed
before the world once again became as biodiverse as it appears
to have been in the Permian.

So what happened? Some scientists have argued that the mass
extinction was caused by a meteorite. But the evidence they put
forward has been undermined by further studies. There is a more
persuasive case for a different explanation. For many years,
geologists have been aware that at some point during or after
the Permian there was a series of gigantic volcanic eruptions
in Siberia. The lava was dated properly for the first time in
the early 1990s. We now know that the principal explosions took
place 251 million years ago, precisely at the point at which
life was almost extinguished.

The volcanoes produced two gases: sulphur dioxide and carbon
dioxide. The sulphur and other effusions caused acid rain, but
would have bled from the atmosphere quite quickly. The carbon
dioxide, on the other hand, would have persisted. By enhancing
the greenhouse effect, it appears to have warmed the world
sufficiently to have destabilised the superconcentrated frozen
gas called methane hydrate, locked in sediments around the polar
seas. The release of methane into the atmosphere explains the
sudden shift in carbon isotopes.

Methane is an even more powerful greenhouse gas than carbon
dioxide. The result of its release was runaway global warming:
a rise in temperature led to changes which raised the temperature
further, and so on. The warming appears, alongside the acid rain,
to have killed the plants. Starvation then killed the animals.

Global warming also seems to explain the geological changes. If
the temperature of the surface waters near the poles increases,
the circulation of marine currents slows down, which means that
the ocean floor is deprived of oxygen. As the plants on land died,
their roots would cease to hold together the soil and loose rock,
with the result that erosion rates would have greatly increased.

So how much warming took place? A sharp change in the ratio of
the isotopes of oxygen permits us to reply with some precision:
six degrees centigrade. Benton does not make the obvious point,
but another author, the climate change specialist Mark Lynas,
does.2 Six degrees is the upper estimate produced by the UN's
scientific body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
for global warming by 2100.3 A conference of some of the world's
leading atmospheric scientists in Berlin last month concluded
that the IPCC's model may have underestimated the problem: the
upper limit, they now suggest, should range between 7 and 10
degrees.4 Neither model takes into account the possibility of
a partial melting of the methane hydrate still present in vast
quantities around the fringes of the polar seas.

Suddenly, the events of a quarter of a billion years ago begin
to look very topical indeed. One of the possible endings of the
human story has already been told. Our principal political effort
must now be to ensure that it does not become set in stone.

www.monbiot.com

References:

1. Michael J. Benton, 2003. When Life Nearly Died: The Greatest
Mass Extinction of All Time. Thames and Hudson, London.

2. Press Release issued by Mark Lynas, 17th June 2003. "New
Evidence Warns of Global Warming `Catastrophe' this Century".

3. Eg Robert Watson, chairman IPCC, 20th November 2000. Report
to the Sixth Conference of the Parties of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change.

4. Fred Pearce, 4th June 2003. Global Warming's
Sooty Smokescreen Revealed. New Scientist.
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993798

Reply via email to