thomas malloy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Keith Nagel responded; > >> Hi Thomas, >> >> you write: >>> I find it odd that BLP ignored me. >> >> Why? Can you explain to the rest of us why you think >> he should take your offer seriously? > > You don't know who I am, I might be talking to an established company > with a group of wealthy investors. > >> Have you ever >> done any contract work for the military? > > No and as I understand it, compliance with their byzantine > regulations is a full time job for at least one person > >> Do you have >> sufficient money and experience to run a start up? > > No, I'm a broker, my hobby is finding new technology that has > economic potential. The amount of capital would have to be figured > out when writing the business plan. > >> When you write, >> "I suggested using hydrinos to harden the interior >> of cannon barrels." do you have any idea how you >> would actually apply the described technology to >> achieve your stated result? > > No, but neither has anyone else. We have lots of engineers here who > are looking for work. > > Then Harry Veeder posted; > > Unlike the emergence of modern science, I don't think the emerging > post-modern science is looking for affirmation from the military. ;-) > > You seem to feel that there is something dirty about making sure that > the people who are defending me have the very best equipment > available. I don't.
Killing and destroying are not sterile. Harry
