thomas malloy wrote:
IMHO, if the device is producing a commercially feasible amount of energy, ten times the input energy, the instrumentation doesn't have to be too complex.
I agree it does not have to be complex, but it has to be present. It is so easy to show 10 x input, why not do it?
The above technology sounds like the Piantelli patent. IMHO, Piantelli's technology was great, but Fiat Allis decided not to pursue it, and Dr. Piantelli didn't answer my emails. I've been expecting something like this.
My Sources today say the gadget resembles Stringham's approach. *I* have been expecting someone to take Stringham's work and run with it.
Arrogance comes with being a genius.
Except when it doesn't. Also, arrogance usually comes with being stupid.
I read the IESI press release. Can someone explain what a heat recovery system has to do with a LENR process?
It is simple. If you have one, you don't need the other.
- Jed
