Perhaps it will be the best for the general public, but for scientists nothing can beat original sources.
True.
Scott Chubb and I had a very pleasant talk with Jack Sandweiss, editor of Physical Review Letters, and also Prof. at Yale University yesterday at the APS conference. He seemed truly open-minded. Though the bottom line came to this - he, and I suspect others like him, is busy - and doesn't have much motivation to take the time to inquire more deeply about CF.
Considering the low probability (in the minds of honest skeptics) of cf, what will motivate scientists to even look (through the telescope)?
We have the data. Now, how do we get their interest?
Perhaps when more papers get published, perhaps not.
Perhaps the interest will be driven by commerce and the science community will be very surprised one day.
Steve
