See the document I cited before:
http://www.awea.org/news/03-04-o5-GlobalWindEnergyMarkets.pdf.
Quote:
"According to the report Wind Force 12 (3), boosting investment in
wind energy to a level where it would
provide 12% of world electricity generation by 2020 would result in
annual reductions of 1,813 million tons of CO2 in 2020 from 1,245,000 MW
of wind energy installed."
I presume that means 1.3 million MW nameplate capacity, or 415,000 MW
real. That comes to 3,842 NPRE (the units I invented equaling an average
U.S. nuclear plant actual output). Earlier I estimated the total world
needs ~2,000 NPRE. That was a very crude estimate; 3,842 is better.
(Actually I am pleased I was within a factor of two.)
With today's power buffering technology the power companies say 12% is a
reasonable target for wind. Above that, they would have difficulty with
load-balancing and during times when the wind does not blow. With
something like hydrogen or advanced low-cost batteries they could do
better. In some parts of the world, things like reversible hydro storage
would already allow a higher percent of the power from wind.
Denmark has so much excess wind power during winter nights they are
having difficulty selling it on the European grid. You can see that above
a certain level power buffering will become as important to the industry
as advances in wind turbine technology.The latest goal in Denmark is to
cover 50% of Danish electricity consumption by 2025. See:
http://www.windpower.org/en/core.htm
Wind now generates roughly as much electricity as the entire world
consumed in 1920. There is so little mention of this in the American
press that American newspaper readers might be excused for thinking that
wind is only a marginal industry that cannot meet global levels of
energy. It would be nice to see ABC news report something like:
"Last year the equivalent of three average U.S. nuclear plants were
added to the world's electric grid . . ."
There are presently 18 NPRE of wind worldwide. Wind power growth is
exponential, with an increase in the increase of ~15% per year for the
last few decades. If this keeps up, wind capacity will surpass nuclear
capacity a generation from now. There are presently 440 nuclear power
plants in the world, and 103 in the U.S. The world average size is a
little smaller than the U.S. average. See:
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.htm
Wind is considerably less polluting than nuclear fission, because it
does not require the mining and refining uranium. Even if we solve the
nuclear waste problem, wind will still be cleaner. It does produce some
pollution, during the manufacture and later the disposal of the
equipment.
- Jed
- AWEA estimate of global power needs Jed Rothwell
- Re: AWEA estimate of global power needs - 15 years to ca... Jed Rothwell
- Re: AWEA estimate of global power needs RC Macaulay