Relating to the general subject of R. Mills and anti-gravity --
I cannot find the actual equation I am looking from a cursory
search, but I do remember it vaguely -
Is Eric Baard still on vortex?
Here is a quote from one of his old articles on Mills:
If spaceships are to hit such speeds, NASA scientists agree that
rockets are a dead end. Mills says the answer may again lie in the
electron, which according to his theory **might be made to respond
negatively to gravity.** He quickly emphasizes that this part of
his work awaits experimentation, and he has kept quiet about it so
far because he's quite aware of how his critics will ridicule it.
Mills is uncharacteristically coy in referring to the antigravity
machine as a "relativity device."
There was a moment when it seemed NASA engineers might look into
Mills' antigravity theory. Luke Setzer, a mechanical engineer at
the Kennedy Space Center in Florida requested permission to
investigate the idea's potential. Setzer says as a mechanical
engineer, he's more intuitively comfortable with Mills'
deterministic view of the universe.
I realized soon after hurrying that off, that the "negative
mass" was incorrect and "does not feel gravity" is the Mills'
contention. Some might argue the two are not as dissimilar as
they seem.
Is "does not feel gravity" not your understanding?
Jones
