The following URL is the Marchese "rocket engine" pdf file, mentioned previously, which may have some relevance to the MAHG (if and when reliable numbers, indicating large OU are forthcoming):
engineering.eng.rowan.edu/~marchese/final-niac.pdf The connection to keep in mind is that Microwave input, even at only a few watts, may be a preferable way to achieve the anomalous MAHG effect. Obviously, the present experimental set-up of Naudin, or something close, needs to be replicated first before moving forward to potential improvements. And it goes without saying that as of now, few observers are confident in the numbers which have been published. Consequently, all of these following comments are premised on there being a real anomaly here, which can be replicated. From there on - there are many possibilites for improvement. If indeed only 5 watts of input is being used for the MAHG anomaly, then if applied at the resonant frequency of neutral atomic hydrogen - 1420 MHz (1.42 GHz), this form of microwave energy would seem to offer better coupling to hydrogen than a pulsed tungsten cathode. This would be true, even if the anomaly were a surface effect of the the gas-metal interface - such as is seen in LENR, since a large anode surface can be made available in either situation. Also IF ... the pulsing itself, and the low duty cycle in particualar, are shown to be a necessary parameter for the anomaly, then there is no reason why a magnetron cannot be pulsed to achieve better coupling. Marchese/Mills got surprising results in the "rocket engine" using a non-resonant frequency (2.45 Ghz) in a non-resonant tube with no surface effect. Had they used the resonant frequency of hydrogen in a correctly dimensioned tube, and they not been reliant on the constant flow of hydrogen at what seems to be too low a pressure, then it concievable that several orders of magnitude better results could be possible. But again, this conclusion is based upon transposing the previous MAHG results, and translating those parameters, which are far from certain (in relaibility), into a new situation. IOW, my feeling is the Mills/Marchese "rocket" experiment missed optimiztion on almost every parameter - frequency, dimension and pressurization - yet still showed an energy anomaly. This may indicate that a robust source of previously unknown energy is availabe in amny types of Microwave-powered cells, and that may or may not be related back to the "hydrino". Since Mills has been at this for 15 years, one would be wise to suspect that his hydrino concept is responsible for both the BLP results and the MAHG, but neither should anyone rule out the prospect that some other modality is at work. It is too bad that more detailed results, like the Marchese experiment, are not available from BLP. As mentioned in a previous posting, the interesting thing about the 1420 MHz frequency in the overall analysis of MAHG, is that this seems to be very close to the exact collision rate of the atoms in the present MAHG device. IOW, if you figure the MFP of the hydrogen molecules at the particular temperature which is necessary to provide the delta-t which is claimed, and at the claimed fill of 80 torr. then the kinetic collision rate per molecule per second is very close to 1,420,000,000. Of course a kinetic collision rate and frequency of EM radiation are NOT normally related in any form that could be said to be causal. Perhaps this is "only" coincidental and unrelated ... that is, if you believe in coincidence. Jones
