At 11:06 AM 9/17/2005, Jed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mitchell Swartz writes:
> "Storms and I do not have a company."
>
> ROTFLOL. With all due respect, this is a laughable attempt at
'plausible deniability' when in fact Storms and
> Rothwell are (and have long been) long-linked at their hips, for
example at the (misnamed) LENR site - which
> is a company.
No, it is not a company.
Yes it is.
This thread began with Jed's mis-definition of 'practical'.
Now the thread suffers from his mis-definition of 'company'.
I vote for what Webster's DENOTES.
definition: Company; "1. an association with another"
"2. a group of persons or
things" [after Websters]
Q.E.D.
Jed, if English is not your first language, you might consider getting a
dictionary.
"The answer is a mirror of the question" - Cogitor Kwyna
