During an archive search for Thomas Malloy's original post on 
Ventura's audio interview with Podkletnov, I happened to turn 
up the following Beaty post which is rather relevant to the 
Podketnov-Hutchison-Shoulders Effect.

     ====================================================
     Tesla article. hoax, but a good one?
     William Beaty
     Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:28:22 -0700

     Here's an old link I stumbled across once again.  
     I don't think we've discussed it here:

       Tesla unknown manuscript
       http://farshores.org/wmtesla.htm

     The missing details about hardware, and all the 
     convenient excuses, clearly says "hoax." But still 
     the concepts are pretty cool.  If not Tesla himself, 
     the author is well-read with considerable experience 
     in crackpot physics.  I particularly liked the part 
     about the radial smoke patterns and weight changes 
     (stolen right from the Podkletnov story?)

     Imagine if aether did exist, if moving aether-blobs 
     could be produced and manipulated with HV equipment, 
     could provide propulsion, cancel inertia, supply 
     energy, etc.  Build a Tesla-based electrogravity 
     aircraft?  Fill your garage with glowing ball 
     lightnings?  Or just take cosmic potshots at the 
     Siberian tundra.

     On the other hand, maybe it's not a hoax...

     ====================================================
  
On starting to read the account passages like....

    "There was an old writing book inside the helmet, 
    apparently used as a lining. The writing book had 
    thin and partially burnt covers producing the smell 
    of mould. All its yellowing sheets were full of notes 
    written in ink faded under the influence of time..."

       ....seem penned by some later day Robert Louis Stevenson 
and as fictional as Treasure Island. However, reading further I 
couldn't help but be astonished how close the insights came to my 
own Beta-atmosphere view of things. Indeed, but for my own 
publications which have a very different starting point than Tesla - 
or his doppelganger - I feel I would not be able to defend myself 
from the charge of plagiarism.

Now obviously, the author and the story about the existence of a 
manuscript, etc., is so much moonshine - but a hoax? I very much doubt 
it. I think it more likely that the author is someone who believed 
what he wrote and wanted to promulgate it - but was too shy or afraid 
to attach his own name to these beliefs out of embarrassment or even 
possibly, fear for his career prospects.

Frank Grimer

Reply via email to