thomas malloy wrote:
Bruce posted;
Don't call me bruce! Call me wes!
Podkletnov's device could be made into a
reactionless drive if we can get reliable mass production of his disks
and steady high voltage power supply. I'm in corrispondance with Dr
Podklenov
This is very interesting. Have you observed this unidirectional force?
No but much of science is based on trust. The effect has not been
indepedantly replicated but the same is true for much of the atom
smashing work in places like CERN.
Do you have an explanation for the mechanism?
Yes but I need to work with a physicist that can do the math.
I was quite fascinated with the reactionless drive. a Both from a
practical and theoretical standpoint.
No drive can be truly reactionless! We are really talking of drives that
interact electrostatically with waves or photons. These become invisible
or insubstantial reaction mass.
There are very few practical examples. The magnetic drive that interact
with the earths magnetic fields is a fuel less drive. A solar sail is
also a fuel less drive.
My theory:
I believe that the electrons in a Bose condensate can absorb ZPE
randomly but can't emit them randomly. It must emit them all in one
direction at a given time. With a sphere or other shape the result is
random but in Podkletnov’s device the Bose is flat and backed up with a
resisting layer. This lazes the ZPE into a beam. It is unidirectional
because the Bose Ion can recoil in only one direction. The beam effects
sub atomic matter through the radiation reaction effect or the
stochastic electrodynamics equivalent.
I need someone who can write the equations.
Does anyone have DR Puthoffs email address? I only have an out of date
address for him. Either that or he thinks I'm a complete nut: which is
about right.
