Thanks Ed the Students guide is my main resource and I've read it. I was
just being thorough and careful before diving in to a room full of
politicians, scientists and others. Better me than you hey.
I have this vision of John Huizinga or someone stubbornly driving to the
mall in the worlds last internal combustion powered car and facing a car
park filled with fusion cars.
Have fun in Japan Folks.
Edmund Storms wrote:
Wesley, read the Student's Guide to Cold Fusion. Most of the major
papers are listed there and their importance is described. A simple
list of papers would not do much good because it is the relationship
between the various observations that is important. An untrained or
uninformed person can not see this relationship very easily, thus the
need for such reviews. As for the skeptics, no amount of reading will
change their minds, so using this method to change minds is a waste
of time.
Regards,
Ed
Wesley Bruce wrote:
I've said to a friend that most critics of cold fusion can't quote or
cite a single paper critical of cold fusion. It's certainly correct
in Australia. but is it correct in all cases. What are the papers
critical of cold fusion and have we debunked them all in turn? We
need a list and counter list on Jeds web site or ISCMNS or some where.
