This article appeared a few weeks later. http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/03/us/physicists-debunk-claim-of-a-new-kind-of-fusion.html
quote from the second page: <<At Stanford University, Prof. Robert A. Huggins repeated the Pons-Fleischmann experiment several weeks ago, and obtained results that seemed to suggest fusion. But Dr. Walter E. Meyerhof, professor of physics at Stanford, told scientists Monday night that he had carefully studied his colleague's apparatus and found that the experiment was flawed because of the system used to measure heat. Nevertheless, Dr. Huggins, a materials scientist, said in a telephone interview that he is ''more confident than ever'' in his results.>> Harry On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Franck Ackalnd digged that old article on a sucessful LENr experiment in 89 > http://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/19/us/stanford-reports-success.html > > I know there was many false positive at the beginning... > what is the final story on that experiment? was it finally positive ? > > It seems too short to have a positive result as most say few month are > required just for loading? > > > > Stanford Reports Success >> By WILLIAM J. BROAD >> Published: April 19, 1989 >> > A team of scientists at Stanford University said yesterday that they had >> duplicated the experiment in which nuclear fusion was reportedly achieved >> in a jar of water at room temperature. The Stanford researchers said they >> measured heat but not radiation or subatomic particles that are often >> produced by nuclear fusion. >> >
