Hello Robin, I understand your project is theoretical. I understand that *today *you have no real result. But after built a test / lab model you would have.
I am sure I missed plenty. However, I think it is possible to find people interested in doing volunteer work. Not saying it is not difficult. It takes a project leader with conviction and passion (I think that is you):) I agree that it is hard to find an engineering company to do the job . It does have very little attraction. They are not convinced it works. They see no future (repeat business ) etc. The key is to find a group of people and make sure the group has all the required skills and resources between them. A double capacity in the essential areas is good. The people need to have passion for the possibilities. Then make an agreement to split the ownership in a generous way. (10% of $1,000 is $100, 100% of $1 is $1 must be the thought). I think you need a clause that says anyone 'defecting' before the project is finalized loses his interest. If you are right (and I suppose you believe so, Otherwise . . ) all the criteria I mentioned will be there and the Angel will change tune.. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:01 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Lennart Thornros's message of Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:23:00 -0800: > Hi Lennart, > > I appear to have made the wrong impression. > The reactions I presented are theoretical, not something I have achieved in > practice. > > >I like your optimism. > >I (as most people) do not know if this is a real possible way to reach > the > >desired result, > >I think you are missing a 'project leader' in your people description. > >Finally why do you need so much money? > >My suggestion would be to form a group and have them volontere their > skills > >/ time. In exchange for a piece of the final result. Next show the > >COP=1.00000001 or better and then spend $5 million to make the comersial > >product with COP = 1000. > >I can guarantee you will attract the $5million. How I can guarantee that? > >Easy you have shown: > >1. Passion > >2. Understanding the technology > >4. Real result > > This is not so. > > >5 Ability to organize the job > >6. risk willingness. > >7. The prediction is correct. > > Which prediction are you referring to? > > >There are many angels out there willing to risk money on that situation. > > Furthermore, note that this has nothing to do with the project on my > website, > which is based around a totally different mechanism. > > Also, you missed something. ;) The project on my website should produce a > device > with a highly controllable power output, ideal for load following. > A dynamic range of a 100 or so should easily be achieved. > > ...but it's all "vapor-ware" at the moment. > > The cost depends on whether one has to pay people to do it, or can indeed > find > an interested group. I found a couple of interested engineers, and signed > them > up, then they disappeared into the woodwork, and contribute nothing. > I can't even find a local engineering firm capable of doing the work for > money. > :( > > As for Angel investors, the best response I have had from any of them so > far is > "good luck", from one of them. > > >On Jan 14, 2015 7:18 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> 7Li+25Mg => 26Mg + 6Li + 3.843 MeV > >> 6Li+17O => 16O + 7Li + 3.107 MeV > >> > >> The only scarce substance is Lithium, and that is continually re-cycled. > >> The other ingredients are literally "dirt" cheap. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Robin van Spaandonk > >> > >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >> > >> > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
