Thanks Terry - I was about to make a similar point regarding fractional hydrogen - you don't have to agree with the Naudt's proposal that the hydrogen is relativistic because even just from the perspective of fractional hydrogen loading into a lattice with defects you are still storing potential energy which we see from the heat after death incidents. The environment that puts hydrogen into these Rydberg/fractional states is storing energy in the orbital - energy levels of the orbital assume observers are in the same inertial frame and these atoms sitting in a stationary lump of hydride on a lab bench can't possibly be relativistic..or can they? What if the vacuum density modified by Casimir suppression could rise to the same level of compression experienced in a deep gravity well, a warp [suppression/equivalent negative acceleration] instead of a well [compression/equivalent positive acceleration]? The gas atoms are loaded into these suppression regions under pressure allowing gas motion [HUP] to massage these atoms into their fractional states. As the pressure slowly leaks back to atmospheric the fractional hydrogen leaves these regions the orbitals want to return to their normal ground state but any bonds will become stressed making them more easily broken to the point of over unity. I could see 137 possible lock steps of bonding and unbonding occur for the most fractional H2.
-----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 10:03 PM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:A strange and screwy claim by Piantelli On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 8:58 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess Piantelli said this . . . or there is a misunderstanding. Perhaps he speaks of fractional Rydberg states? You could call that energy stored from about 13 billion years ago. :-)
