What I don't understand is how the reactants (before they have bonded)
can have a zero point vibration energy. Is it simply a sum of each
reactants respective quantum wave lengths?

Harry




On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Roarty, Francis X
<[email protected]> wrote:
> [snip] "In this scenario, the lightweight muonium atom would move rapidly
> between two heavy bromine atoms, 'like a Ping Pong ball bouncing between two
> bowling balls,' Fleming says. The oscillating atom would briefly hold the
> two bromine atoms together and reduce the overall energy, and therefore
> speed, of the reaction.”[/snip]
>
>
>
> I wonder if it can form between 2 molecules / lower their energy  such that
> their disassociation threshold is lower than the energy given off upon the
> nearly instantaneous re-association .. could this be our run away mechanism?
> In that it is not van der Walls force it represents another force vector
> that can oppose the isotropy based on geometry. Previously I have endorsed
> H2 as the molecule being discounted and forming an endless reversible
> reaction but your citation would suggest the hydrogen proton as the enabler
> discounting the bonds of nearby larger atoms but still a ZPE perspective
> which I continue to believe is the ultimate source of this anomaly.
>
> Fran
>
>
>
> From: H Veeder [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 4:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:New type of chemical bond discovered
>
>
>
> another link
>
>
> Isotope effect produces new type of chemical bond
>
> http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/2014/10/isotope-effect-produces-new-type-chemical-bond
>
>
>
> quote <<In the early 1980s it was proposed that in certain transition states
> consisting of a very light atom sandwiched between two heavy ones, the
> system would be stabilised not by conventional van der Waal’s forces, but by
> vibrational bonding, with the light atom shuttling between its two
> neighbours. However, despite several groups searching for such a system none
> was demonstrated and the hunt fizzled out.
>
> Now, Jörn Manz, of the Free University of Berlin and Shanxi University in
> China, and colleagues believe they have the theoretical and experimental
> evidence to demonstrate a stable vibrational bond.>>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:34 AM, H Veeder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> New type of chemical bonddiscovered
> http://www.sciencealert.com/new-type-of-chemical-bond-discovered
>
> Move over, covalent and ionic bonds, there’s a new chemical bond in town,
> and it loves to shake things up.
>
> It’s taken decades to nail down, but researchers in Canada have finally
> identified a new chemical bond, which they’re calling a ‘vibrational bond’.
>
> This vibrational bond seems to break the law of chemistry that states if you
> increase the temperature, the rate of reaction will speed up. Back in 1989,
> a team from the University of British Columbia investigated the reactions of
> various elements to muonium (Mu) - a strange, hydrogen isotope made up of an
> antimuon and an electron. They tried chlorine and fluorine with muonium, and
> as they increased the heat, the reaction time sped up, but when they tried
> bromine (br), a brownish-red toxic and corrosive liquid, the reaction time
> sped up as the temperature decreased. The researchers, Amy Nordrum writes
> for Scientific American, "were flummoxed”.
>
> Perhaps, thought one of the team, chemist Donald Flemming, when the bromine
> and muonium made contact, they formed a transitional structure made up of a
> lightweight atom flanked by two heavier atoms. And the structure was joined
> not byvan der Waal’s forces - as would usually be expected - but by some
> kind of temporary ‘vibrational’ bond that had been proposed several years
> earlier.
>
> Nordrum explains:
>
> "In this scenario, the lightweight muonium atom would move rapidly between
> two heavy bromine atoms, 'like a Ping Pong ball bouncing between two bowling
> balls,' Fleming says. The oscillating atom would briefly hold the two
> bromine atoms together and reduce the overall energy, and therefore speed,
> of the reaction.”
>
> But back then, the team didn’t have the technology needed to actually see
> this reaction take place, because it lasts for just a few milliseconds. But
> now they do, and the team took their investigation to the nuclear
> accelerator at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in England.
>
> With the help of theoretical chemists from the Free University of Berlin and
> Saitama University in Japan, Flemming’s team watched as the light muonium
> and heavy bromine formed a temporary bond. “The lightest isotopomer, BrMuBr,
> with Mu the muonium atom, alone exhibits vibrational bonding in accord with
> its possible observation in a recent experiment on the Mu + Br2 reaction,”
> the team reports in the journal Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
> "Accordingly, BrMuBr is stabilised at the saddle point of the potential
> energy surface due to a net decrease in vibrational zero point energy that
> overcompensates the increase in potential energy.”
>
> In other words, the vibration in the bond decreased the total energy of the
> BrMuBr structure, which means that even when the temperature was increased,
> there was not enough energy to see an increase in the reaction time.
>
> While the team only witnessed the vibrational bond occurring in a bromine
> and muonium reaction, they suspect it can also be found in interactions
> between lightweight and heavy atoms, where van der Waal’s forces are assumed
> to be at play.
>
> "The work confirms that vibrational bonds - fleeting though they may be -
> should be added to the list of known chemical bonds,” says Nordrum at
> Scientific American.
>
> Sorry, future high school chemistry students, here's another thing you'll
> probably have to rote learn.
>
> Source: Scientific American
>
>
>
> -----------
>
>
>
> This link has a diagram of the potential energy curve for  a vibrational
> bond:
>
>
>
> A new type of chemical bond has been confirmed – the vibrational bond
>
> http://www.zmescience.com/science/chemistry/new-kind-chemical-vibrational-bond-0543543/
>
>
>
>
>
> Harry
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to