Most people do not read references. Did you read the post? Do you have an opinion on the monopole, its mechanism for power accumulation, and the additive nature of EMF?
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you, Christopher Baird. > > > https://sciencequestionswithchris.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/why-is-gravity-the-strongest-force/ > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Actually, gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces. Ordered >> from strongest to weakest, the forces are 1) the strong nuclear force, 2) >> the electromagnetic force, 3) the weak nuclear force, and 4) gravity. If >> you take two protons and hold them very close together, they will exert >> several forces on each other. Because they both have mass, the two protons >> exert gravitational attraction on each other. Because they both have a >> positive electric charge, they both exert electromagnetic repulsion on each >> other. Also, they both have internal “color” charge and thus exert >> attraction via the strong nuclear force. >> >> Because the strong nuclear force is the strongest at short distances, it >> dominates over the other forces at that small dimension and the two protons >> become bound, forming a helium nucleus (typically a neutron is also needed >> to keep the helium nucleus stable). Gravity is so weak at the atomic scale >> that scientists can typically ignore it without incurring significant >> errors in their calculations. >> >> However, on astronomical scales, gravity does dominate over the other >> forces. There are two reasons for this: 1) gravity has a long range, and 2) >> there is no such thing as negative mass. Each force dies off as the two >> objects experiencing the force become more separated. The rate at which the >> forces die off is different for each force. The strong and weak nuclear >> forces are very short ranged, meaning that outside of the tiny nuclei of >> atoms, these forces quickly drop to zero. The tiny size of the nuclei of >> atoms is a direct result of the extreme short range of the nuclear forces. >> Two particles that are nanometers apart are far too distant from each other >> to exert an appreciable nuclear force on each other. >> >> If the nuclear forces are so weak for two particles only nanometers >> apart, it should be obvious that the nuclear forces are even more >> negligible on astronomical scales. For instance, the earth and sun are far >> too distant from each other (billions of meters) for their nuclear forces >> to reach each other. In contrast to the nuclear forces, importantly both >> the electromagnetic force and gravity have infinite range and die off in >> strength as 1/r2. >> If both electromagnetism and gravity have infinite range, why is the >> earth held in orbit around the sun by gravity and not by the >> electromagnetic force? The reason is that there is no such thing as >> negative mass, but there is such thing as negative electric charge. If you >> place a single positive electric charge near a single negative electric >> charge, and then measure their combined force on another, distant charge, >> you find that the negative charge tends to cancel out the positive charge >> somewhat. Such an object is called an electric dipole. The electromagnetic >> force caused by an electric dipole dies off as 1/r3 and not 1/r2 because of >> this canceling effect. Similarly, if you take two positive electric charges >> and two negative charges and place them close together properly, you have >> created an electric quadrupole. Almost without exception, the >> electromagnetic force due to an electric quadrupole dies off even more >> rapidly, as 1/r4, because the negative charges do such a good job of >> canceling the positive charges. As you add more and more positive charges >> to an equal number of negative charges, the range of the electromagnetic >> force of the system gets shorter and shorter. The interesting thing is that >> most objects are made out of atoms, and most atoms have an equal number of >> positive and negative electric charges. Therefore, despite the fact that >> the raw electromagnetic force of a single charge has an infinite range, the >> effective range of the electromagnetic force for typical objects such as >> stars and planets is much shorter. In fact, neutral atoms have an effective >> electromagnetic range on the order of nanometers. >> >> On astronomical scales, this leaves only gravity. If there were such a >> thing as negative mass (antimatter has positive mass), and if atoms >> generally contained equal parts of positive and negative mass, then gravity >> would suffer the same fate as electromagnetism and there would be no >> significant force at the astronomical scale. Fortunately, there is no >> negative mass, and therefore the gravitational force of multiple bodies >> close together is always additive. In summary, gravity is the weakest of >> the forces in general, but it is the dominant one at astronomical scales >> because it has the longest range and because there is no negative mass. >> >> However, if we could create a structure that contains only one polarity >> of spin, that structure would behave exactly like gravity in its effect >> with both gravity and EMF being of infinite range and additive in nature. >> A selective template or mask enforces this spin selection process. This is >> the essence and power of the monopole. This is at the taproot of LENR. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> In this way, the additive nature of gravity can transform this most >>>> feeble force in nature into a process that is so powerful that it can rip >>>> space and time apart to produce black holes of gigantic size. >>> >>> >>> Would you like salad dressing with that? >>> >>> Eric >>> >> >> >
