Hi all As has been noted on Ecatworld in a post by US_Citizen71 http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/04/rossi-responds-to-publication-of-inspection-report/ and as many thought from the disjointed ambiguous and odd phrasing in the letter as well as missing pages, the letter appears to be a Photoshop job. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxCBtZoq-VqLd1VOd3dVS2pRWGM/view
Kind Regards walker On 5 February 2015 at 16:03, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wrote: > > >> I have no idea why J. T. Vaughn said what he said, but I expect he did >> say it. I do not think he is the sort of person who lies. Perhaps they are >> fed up with Rossi? >> > > I do not know who said what to whom, but let's go over this statement > again: > > "Mr JT Vaughn stated .. that Mr Rossi did not appear credible (paraphrase)" > > Imagine an inspector from the State of South Carolina were to call me on > the phone and ask: "regarding this fellow Rossi, does he have any > credibility with the scientific mainstream?" I would say "no, he doesn't." > I might add that he has not published anything, he says controversial > things, and he has a checkered past. I think it is obvious to anyone that > he does not appear credible. > > I think some of Rossi's claims are probably true. Others I think are > exaggerated or mistaken. He certainly has a credibility problem. I was > hoping the second Elforsk test would settle the issue once and for all but > unfortunately I do not think it has. > > If Vaughn said something like that, I don't see how anyone can criticize > it. > > - Jed > >
